SR 06:090A - Laserfiche WebLink

Proiected Enrollments from 2005 to 2015 Pleasanton Unified SchDof District Chart 1: Change In Enrollment Distribution from Areas with No New Housing since Sept. 2000 1200 1100 .",,-, 1000 l!! t: .:J 900 " , Iii ... , , , 800 .",- " 700 , ... - --... , --... ;/... --.. - - , -- , , , , , , , , ---~- ,- - - Oct. 2000 1- .Oct. 2005 , . ./ , 600 K 2 3 4 567 Grade 8 9 10 11 12 Recent Resident Student PODulation Chanaes bv TVDe of Existino Housina A key refinement in the analysis of the trends in existing housing is to determine the degree to which the overall patterns are shared by the various dwelling types and price levels. As was mentioned at the start of this report, trends that are established throughout the community generally are more likely to continue than those that are concentrated in only a few situations. By assigning a standardized, but nonetheless subjective, EPC classification to the dominant residential type in each of 230 pianning areas that we created, and then aggregating the area counts for every such classification of existing dwellings, we have again been able to determine the diversity of the latest trends. These findings are summarized in Table 4 on the following page, with additional information provided in Appendix B. Most of Table 4 should be self-explanatory. These are counts and percentages of the resident student populations of district-enrolled students over the last five years. There are five categories of existing single-family-detached (SFD) homes and three groupings of attached dwelling types (with attached, or ATT, covering apartments, condominiums, townhouses and duets). The income levels listed are EPC interpolations based on the approximate relative price ranges of those housing units. "Modest & Moderate Income" SFD, for example, is a relative term to the other categories of detached residences that are present in the district. The key figures to observe in Table 4 are (1) the student population changes since October of 2000 and (2) how the percentage of the total that is grades K-5 has been evolving for each category. In the "Modest & Moderate Income" SFD group, for instance, the student population has both declined and become older, as shown by the bold "-29" and the drop in the K-5 percentage from 47% to 43% (see "boxed" figures). The table also shows that this result occurred somewhat erratically during that time, with small gains in the first two years that were more than offset by losses since 2002. :=nroilmer:r F'rme:;tJor: ~onsu:rant' Page 1C