My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:090
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:090
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2006 1:49:07 PM
Creation date
3/16/2006 1:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:090
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the purposes of the Environmental Impact Report. Staff is suggesting options that would be <br />built on two major themes: <br /> <br />. Option A: "Dispersed Residential Development". This option would result in a mix <br />of higher- and lower-density housing, with new single-family housing located where <br />currently planned in the hill areas, as well as in East Pleasanton (quarry areas), and <br />scattered sites city-wide, such as the Valley TrailslEvangelical Free Church site. <br />Some amount of higher density housing would also be located in Hacienda, adjacent <br />to the new BART station, and in the Downtown. <br /> <br />. Option B: "Concentrated Residential Development". This option would result in <br />more high-density housing located close to the existing and future BART stations, and <br />the Downtown, and perhaps the transfer of some residential density from large lots on <br />the hills to these areas. <br /> <br />These options would likely have different impacts on potential student generation, on <br />enrollment at existing schools, and on the need for future school facilities. Option A would <br />likely continue the existing geographic distribution of students, and potentially add additional <br />students on the east side of the City. Option B would add more housing units in the north of <br />the City than Option A, although the generation of students in these higher density <br />multifamily units may be different from the more typical single family homes. Staff is <br />seeking City Council and Board comment on the range of options that should be considered <br />as part of the General Plan update. The City Council and Planning Commission will focus on <br />land use options at the next General Plan workshop. <br /> <br />GENERAL PLAN SCHEDULE <br /> <br />Attachment 3: General Plan Workflow shows General Plan progress to date and the tasks <br />remaining. After agreement on the range ofland use alternatives to be tested (Workshop <br />#7), tentatively scheduled for April II, 2006, the results of preliminary modeling of traffic <br />and fiscal impacts will be available in July 2006, and a decision on a "Preferred General <br />Plan" and alternatives for the purposes on the EIR is anticipated in October 2006. The Draft <br />General Plan and Draft EIR would be available for public review in early 2007 with <br />certification of the EIR and adoption of the new General Plan by the Summer of2007. <br /> <br />SR 06:090 <br />Page 5 of6 <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.