My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 94042
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
RES 94042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 4:22:49 PM
Creation date
3/2/1999 7:22:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council: <br /> <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> <br /> The purpose of this report is to present the status of operating and capital improvement budgets. <br /> Actual revenues and expenditures to dan: have been analyzed and compared to budgeted revenues <br /> and expenditures, respectively. Taking seasonal variations into account, projections for the next <br /> six months were then made to enable staff to update the budget for the entire fiscal year. <br /> Furthermore, since staff is in the process of preparing next fiscal year's operating budget and <br /> capital improvement program, updating the current year's projections provides a good starting <br /> point for projecting next year. <br /> <br /> OVERVIEW OF SECOND QUARTER 1993-94 <br /> <br />Building permit revenue is nmning slightly ahead of staffs initial projections, but most <br />development related revenues are under projections on an annualized basis. The County's last <br />estimates of property tax revenues are slightly less than staffs adjusted projections. Without <br />information about the Christmas quarter yet, it is difficult to know the status of sales tax <br />revenues. The first quarter acmais were down 13%, but staff projected a decrease for that <br />quarter, as explained in more detail below. However, the most recent annualized estimates made <br />by the City's sales tax auditor, indicate that the original sales tax projection may be too high. <br /> <br />Staff has been faced with balancing the 1993-94 budget, which reflects the loss of $1.1 million <br />in new property tax revenue shifts thin year, combined with a $1.3 million loss as part of th~ <br />ongoing effect of 1992-93 State budget tax shifts. This challenge continues to be met by filling <br />vacant positions on a case-by-case basis; delaying the purchase of some equipment; sharing <br />resources of both-personnel and equipment between departments; and closely reviewing <br />overtime, temporary and contract personnel, materials and supply expenditures, and drawing on <br />the established Temporary Recession Reserve as planned. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES <br /> <br />Appendix B (starting on page 37) details all General Fund revenues by line item, comparing <br />original projections with the recommended new projections. Appendix C (starting on page 45) <br />summarizes the revenues by major type. A discussion of major revenues follows below. <br /> <br />Property Taxes <br /> <br />Property tax revenue projections were reduced by $1.1 million in the First Quarter 1993-94 <br />Financial Report, to reflect additional tax shifts made by the State as a part of its 1993-94 <br />budget. The County provided the City with an updated projection in March of property taxes. <br />As a result of this latest projection, staff is reducing the revenue projections only sligh~y (by <br />$50,000 net). Total property tax revenues are now projected to be $11.8 million. <br /> <br />SR 94:100 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.