My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95137
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95137
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 8:57:47 AM
Creation date
3/2/1999 5:56:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Capital Reserve Transfers are made from the General Fund Capital Projects Reserve to the CIP. <br />Sohrces of money to date have been one-time revenues and one-time savings. Use of the funds <br />has been for cash payments for the construction of major ca ital projects and facilities. Because <br />of the City's current level of debt, it is not possible to debt ~rL~nce all new facilities using <br />General Fund revenues alone for repayment. Historically, the City has paid cash for some <br />projects such as the two middle school gyms. It has fully financed other pro'ects such as the <br />OSC and the Police Facility. Sometimes the City has used a combination o~debt and cash to <br />fund a project, such as in the case of the Senior Center. <br />Staff is currently reviewing develo merit fees in accordance with AB 1600. As part of this study. <br />staff has identified future parks ~gfacilities, required through buildout of the City, by using the' <br />CIP and the Master Facilities Plan documents. It is estimated that approximately $30 million <br />will be needed over the next twenty years for parks and facilities not funded by new <br />development. Potentially General Obligation or assessment bonds could be used to finance some <br />of these facilities, with property owners making the debt payments. However, the balance will <br />need to be funded by the General Fund at a cost of approximately one to three millions dollars <br />annually (either in cash or lease purchase payments). Therefore, as part of the City's long term <br />financial planning and budgeting, we should expect to annually fund some portion of future <br />capital projects from the General Fund. <br /> <br /> General Fund Recommended Carryovers <br /> <br /> The reserve for carryovers is to rovide the funds for specific goods and services which were <br /> budgeted in 1994-95 but which Kad not been received or completed by June 30, 1995 (see <br /> Appendix B). Similar reserves are recommended in the Water, Sewer and other O rating <br /> Funds, and the Capital Improvement Funds. A proving these types of carryovers ~ been <br /> routinely done each year. These carryovers will be reflected as amendments to the 1995-96 <br /> budget. <br /> Recommended General Fund ex enditure carryovers total $675,000. These carryovers consist of <br /> ~ for goods and services ~r which commitments have been made. Also included is <br /> ~ for Council approved items that staff is recommending be done, but for which <br /> contracts/commitments have not been ~naized. These consist of $200,000 for the G. eneral Plan <br /> Update; $47,000 for Engineering and Recreation software; $97,000 for contract services; <br /> $33,000 for equipment; $8,000 in reimbursables (offset by revenue); $77,000 for salary <br /> adjustments a proved in emplo ee contracts' $42,000 to the Downtown Association for <br /> organizationa~Psupport and mar[:ting; and $~i9,000 for additional City Hall space, which has <br /> previously been approved by Council. <br /> Also included is a transfer-in carryover of $5,300 from the Community Development Block <br /> Grant Fund (CDBG), for administration. <br /> This brings the net recommended General Fund expenditure and transfer carryovers to I;670.000. <br /> <br /> General Fund 1994:95 Net Income and Reserve Balances <br /> Overall, after accounting for carryovers, General Fund expenditures/transfers-out exceeded <br /> revenues/transfers-in by $367,000. This is $1.9 million better than projections due to a one-time <br /> net revenue adjustment of about $900,000, and expenditures being about $960,000 less than <br /> budgeted. Staff is recommending that an additional $160,000 be added to the 10% Reserve for <br /> Economic Uncertainties (in addition to the $100,000 originally budgeted), and the remaining <br /> $1.7 million be added to the Capital Projects Reserve. <br /> Staff further recommends that appropriate uses for the $1.7 million be examined along with the <br /> rest of the Capital Improvement Program when it is considered. Potential uses for the money <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br /> SR 95:386 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.