Laserfiche WebLink
Recornmer~ed Improvement Plan <br /> <br /> General Plan that may significantly reduce the ability of the facility to meet the <br /> Traffic Service Objectives. The RTPC will be responsible for establishing the type and <br /> size of amendment that will require review by the RTPC and the process for imple- <br /> menting this review. Approval of a General Plan Amenament found to be inconsistent <br /> with the adopted Action Plan-~ may render the jurisdiction ineligible for Local Street <br /> M~intenance Improvement Funds from the CCTA. <br /> <br /> Consistency with the Action Plsn~ can be achieved by revising the proposed ~mend- <br /> ment, adopting local actions to offset impacts to the Route of Regional Significance, or <br /> Council or Board denial of the smenclment. <br /> <br />-- Jurisdictions in Tri-Valley may implement a proactive Growth and Congestion <br /> Management strategy once a detailed growth management study has been conducted, <br /> The study should indicate the development reductions, land use density reductions, or <br /> other types of growth management/control that would be required for each applicable <br /> Tri-Valley jurisdiction in order to achieve TSO standards. Any development reduction <br /> should be proportional to the traf~c distribution ..... ' .... for each jurisdiction. Any <br /> development reductions should be considered for their equitable effect on the develop- <br /> ment potential of the participating indictions. Reductions should not create a 'race' <br /> to develop~ and if adopted, shall insure that .iurisdictions with relatively greator <br /> development potential do not bear the full brunt of the development reductions. Also, <br /> the impact of ~.h~a development reduction to trs~c impact fees should be analyzedl <br /> other alternatives such as a toll road may also be analyzed. All jurisdictions will then <br /> review this information and know exactly how much reduction in development or <br /> growth management/control is needed to meet the TSOs. The growth management <br /> study and any impact fees would each have to be approved unnn~mously. Violations or <br /> pmiected violations of TSO standards remsin~ng after a growth management strate2v <br /> is adopted shall be resolved as discussed on page 237 of the Plan. <br /> <br /> Jobs-Housing Balance <br /> <br /> Another aspect of land use growth relevant to tr~n-~portation p]nnn~ng is jobs-housing <br /> balance. The Tri-Valley now has more housing than jobs. The 2010 expected land use <br /> scenario includes more job growth t, hnn housing growth, which will establish a <br /> balance. Because of the dynnmlcs Of the Bay Area, in-commuting and out-commuting <br /> will still occur, but at least they are reduced with a jobs-housing balance in the Tri- <br /> Valley. <br /> <br /> The importance of a jobs-housing balance is further reinforced by the gateway <br /> constraints that will exist in the Tri-Valley area. Trip-mnldng into and out of the area <br /> will become increasingly tl~cult in the future. The provision of a job for every <br /> employed resident and vice versa will rnlnlmi~e the need for residents to leave the <br /> area for work. This will m~nlmj~e the trnffic pressure at the gateways. <br /> <br /> An important issue to remember with regard to jobs-housing balance is that the <br /> nnmerical count alone is in=-~dent to achieve the desired result of rn~n~rn~dng travel. <br /> The housing must be of a variety to be affordable to each income level. <br /> <br /> Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 131 <br /> <br /> <br />