Laserfiche WebLink
Issues that were brought up at this meeting included the need to <br />clarify the minimum in-line facility required to meet the need of <br />skaters and the cost of such a facility. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to meet with members of the in-line skating <br />community to clearly identify minimum need and to establish space <br />requirements and cost for such a facility. After the in-line <br />skaters identified the minimum facility required, staff was <br />directed to meet again with the project Task Force to review those <br />needs and determine Task Force support for including in-line <br />facilities considering any new information gathered. <br /> <br /> In-Line Skatinq Meetinq <br /> <br />March 30, 1995, a meeting was held with members of the in-line <br />skating community. At that time, a serious attempt was made to <br />identify from the users perspective both the minimum and desired <br />facility need and the minimum and desired program for an in-line <br />skating facility. Those attending the meeting largely represented <br />the street hockey interests. <br /> <br />The minimum facility defined by those attending the in-line meeting <br />was two 40' x 140' rinks with 4' boards, fencing or net on rear of <br />goal area, substantial goal for puck or ball, a wide band of paving <br />around the rink, good drainage and official striping. The rink <br />could either be asphalt or concrete, but, if asphalt, should be <br />light in color. The preferred facility would have two 85' x 175' <br />concrete rinks with side boards and fencing. <br /> <br />The minimum program desired would include open times, league play <br />for spring, summer, and fall, have qualified officials and provide <br />some access for adults. <br /> <br /> Task Force Review <br /> <br />The Task Force met on April 3, 1995 to review the new information <br />available regarding in-line skating. The information included that <br />gathered at the in-line skating meeting and the cost analysis <br />prepared by the consultant. <br /> <br />The Task Force again indicated their support for Concept C and <br />expressed concern regarding the increased intensity of use that <br />would be experienced by adding two in-line skating rinks, the <br />shortfall of on-site parking that would result from the addition of <br />in-line skating, and, finally, the cost of the in-line skating <br />facility, $160,000, would require additional removal of other park <br />elements if the project was to be kept in balance. It was noted <br />that the Task Force had already supported eliminating a rest room <br />and two tennis courts in order to keep the project within budget. <br /> <br />· Park and Recreation Commission Review and Action <br /> <br />April 13, 1995, the Park and Recreation Commission held a third <br />public hearing. The information gathered at the in-line skating <br /> <br />SR 95:142 5 <br /> <br /> <br />