Laserfiche WebLink
Expected Forecasts <br /> <br /> Lend Use Forecosts <br /> <br /> The land use forecasts used in the expected traffic projections are based on informs- <br /> tion provided by the member jurisdictions of the TVTC (see TaMe 5-1). The 2010 land <br /> use forecasts do not represent buildout of the Tri-Valley area, as specified by the <br /> jurisdiction's general plan, nor do they represent ABAG projections. Rather, the <br /> forecasts represent each jurisdiction's estimate of absorption rates for new houses and <br /> businesses through 2010. Note that the estimates were based on a five percent <br /> vacancy rate. <br /> <br /> The "expected" forecasts show an increase in both housing and employment from that <br /> ass-reed under "baseline" forecasts discussed in the previous chapter. The "baseline" <br /> forecasts assume a 78 percent and 82 percent increase in housing and employment, <br /> respectively, between 1990 and 2010. Under the 'expected" forecast, the increase <br /> would be 84 and 99 percent, respectively, which exceeds historic growth trends. The <br /> reason for the increase is that Contra Costa County, Alameda County, Dublin, and <br /> Livermore had passed general plan Amendments that were not reflected in the <br /> baseline forecasts. <br /> <br /> Overall, "expected" forecasts balance employed residents to employment. 1990 land use <br /> data shows a slight irabalance with 122,882 employed residents and 111,656 jobs. The <br /> "expected" forecasts increase employment at a greater rate than housing resulting in <br /> 224,733 employed residents and 222,024 jobs. Note that no adjustments were made to <br /> the forecasts to reflect changes in the absorption rate as a result of higher traffic <br /> impact fees. <br /> <br /> Network Assumptions <br /> <br /> Staff from the Tri-Valley jurisdictions outlined the future road network assumptions. <br /> These network assumptions are shown in Table 5-2 and Figure 5-1. The major <br /> criterion that was considered when including a particular improvement in the future <br /> road network was whether that improvement was likely to be constructed by 2010. <br /> Not all of the future road network is currently funded. See Chapter 7 for a further <br /> discussion of the unfunded pertions. <br /> <br /> The local road widening and extension projects included in the future network are all <br /> included in local general plans and are all funded or expected to be funded by 2010. <br /> Many are expected to be funded with impact fees on new development or will be built <br /> by developers to serve their projects. <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 64 <br /> <br /> <br />