Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I Memo I Pages = 3 <br /> . <br /> ~C1T.J'1n,...""",\8SG2S. dOD <br /> To. Wayne Rasmussen <br /> · Principal Planner <br /> Office: City of Pleasanton <br /> P. o. Bax520 <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 <br /> Phone: 510484-8158 <br /> Fax: 510484-8385 <br /> From: Roberta Mundie <br /> Firm: Mundie & Associates <br /> 3452 Sacramento Street <br /> San Francisco, CA 94118-1914 <br /> Phone: 415-441-9640 <br /> Fax: 415-441-9683 <br /> Date: July 25, 1998 <br /> Subject: Elaboration of Housing-Related Responses <br /> Comments: <br /> In response to recent questions dwing the City Council review of the General Plan and <br /> the environmental documents, I have prepared an elaboration of our initial reply to <br /> some of the housing-related the carnments of Noreen Ambrose (June 13, 1996) and <br /> Wilson Wendt (May 28, 1996). <br /> The letters both express concerns about the adequaCY of Plessantonls planned <br /> housing supply. In the Ambrose letter, it is argued: <br /> [Comment 4] ... that the reduction in the number of housing units that could be approved <br /> could have the direct result of reducing the regional housing supply. <br /> [Comment 51 ... that the FEIR response fails to explain why it is not necessary to <br /> analyze ''where the housing demand that would nqt be accommodated in <br /> Pleasanton would be diverted to..... . <br /> In the Wendt letter, it is argued: <br /> [Comment 4] ... that "there is no fadual basis given to justify [the) condusion" that <br /> the planned housing supply will be adequate for Pleasanton residents <br /> who work outside Pleasanton. <br /> This memorandum provides a more fully documented response to the housing supplyl <br /> housing diversion question. <br /> 1 <br />