RES 99002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 99-02 Page 3 elevation, the house had not had the approved color applied to it, and certain other items pertaining to the house were not completed; and WHEREAS, as part of conditional temporary occupancy requirements, and in order to guarantee the completion of the exterior elevations and all outstaMing health and safety items, the Nelsons deposited certain funds in a bank account; and WHEREAS, in June 1998, the Nelsons requested to use a stucco color coat on the house that was lighter than the color that had been approved for the house and which, in the City staff's view, would not be consistent with the conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the Nelsons at that time indicated that they did not like the approved color and wanted to change it; and WHEREAS, the Nelsons, without receiving approval to modify the prior approved color, applied to the house a stucco color coat different (lighter) than that which had been approved; and WHEREAS, the Nelsons then requested staff approval to allow the stucco color coat that had been applied to remain; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator determined that the applied stucco color was not consistent with the conditions of approval for the home and therefore denied the request; and WHEREAS, the Nelsons appealed that decision to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission denied the appeal, agreeing with the Zoning Administrator' s decision that the applied color was too light and did not meet the prior conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the Nelsons then appealed to the City Council the decision of the Zoning Administrator as upheld by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal was held before the City Council on January 5, 1999; and