My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 98137
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
RES 98137
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:17:21 AM
Creation date
1/12/1999 4:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RE SOLUTION NO. 9 8-13 7 <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF A DECISION <br /> OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEREBY <br /> APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF RICARDO OLIVEIRA <br /> (AP-98-13/UP-98-46) FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Ricardo Oliveira applied for a conditional use permit to operate a martial arts <br /> studio in an approximately 2,400 square foot tenant space located at 148 Ray <br /> Street; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is C-C (Central Commercial) District, Core Area Overlay <br /> District, and Downtown Revitalization District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission denied the application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, the applicant filed an <br /> appeal of the Planning Commission's decision; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City Council on October 20, <br /> 1998 on the appeal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, actions of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the <br /> Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, no environmental <br /> document was prepared for this proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings: <br /> <br /> 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the <br /> objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the Districts in <br /> which the site is located. <br /> <br /> 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under <br /> which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the <br /> public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or <br /> improvements in the vicinity. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.