PC 082405 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to an inquiry by Commissioner l=ox regarding the date of the approval letter and whether the Happy Valley residents would be able to look at a draft, Nlr_ Pavan replied that the plans have been made available because the initial notice stated the plans were available for examination in the Planning Department He noted that copies of the drawings had been made available to Mr_ Close and Ms_ Kawaihau_ Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, noted that Mr. Pavan had made the drawings and color renderings available to her through email noti fi3cation to the 40 property owners in the Happy Valley area. T o date, two people have asked to see there. Shc toted that because of the small size of Pleasanton's police force, traffi3c enfibrcement that is needed on Vasco Road, Greenville Road, and the more heavily traveled county roads was difficult to enforce" She noted that the Highway Patrol had come out several times, but preferred not to do so. She offered to write a letter to the Highway Patrol. Ms" Nerland advised that with respect to county roads, the agreement reached many years ago was that enforcement of criminal violations in the unincorporated areas would be done by the Sheriff and traffic matters would be handled by the CHP_ However, G'ity of Pleasanton police otf3cers may issue tickets and enforce violations on any publicly mat ntainad roads. Unlike the private road scenario discussed at the last meeting, any traffic violation on a county road seen by City police officers may be enforced by therri_ She noted that enforcement of County roads was not under the City's jurisdiction. Nonetheless, because the golf course will be part of regular patrols and to get to the golf course, one must travel on county roads, she understood firom the Police Department that they expect that those roads will have a greater police presence than they have had in the past" 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Ms. Decker advised that Item 6.d. PUD-38 L nn Jansen would be continued to a future Commission meeting- She noted that the applicant had been working since last fall into spring of 2005 to reach agreements with adjacent property owners- The last agreement was with the Altieri-Marshall properties to the west of the site, and those conditions were included in the most recent Commission packet in April" Since then, the applicant has been working witkt the Jones family to review and revisit some of the conditions and agreements- Several items still need attention, and staff suggested to the applicant that it would be appropriate to continue the item" 5_ MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. 6_ PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS a_ PDR-421. Keon Youu~ Lee Work session to review and provide comments on a proposal to develop a 1 5,488-square-foot two-building commercial development on a 1 .44-acre site located at 3283 Bernal Avenue" Zoning for the property is PUD-C (Planned Unit Development - Commercials District. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 24, 2005 Page 3 of 11