PC 081005 - Laserfiche WebLink

_-- the Ponderosa homeowners who had. not yet moved into their homes be noticed on this item if it came before the Commission again- Mr_ Walsh noted that the property was located in the middle o£a General Plan-designated industrial section- No action was taken- The Planning G'ommission recessed for a break at 9. 7 2 p.m. Chairperson Maas reconvened the meeting at 9.25 p. m. Chairperson Maas noted that Item 6.f._ PDR-421, John Lee, would be continued to August 24, 2005_ c_ PUD-OS-I IMQ. Frank and Barbara Berlo~ar/Kenneth and Pamela Cbrisman Application for a major modification. of the PUD development plan to replace the approved house design plans with design guidelines and to separate the development of the overall project into two phases- The property is a 13.2-acre site located at 1944 and 2200 Vineyard Avenue, in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR Planned Unit Development -Low Density Residenti alb District- Commissioner Roberts noted that she did not have a conflict of interest with respect to this item and that her home was not within 500 feet of the C:hrisman property or this section of the Berlogar property- Commissioner Blank noted that he had mat Mr_ Berlogar approximately six months ago at a school function but did not discuss this prof ect_ - Ms_ Decker presented the staff report and described the history and scope of this project. She advised that the application would also update previous requirements on green building measures and construction, demolition, and waste recycling to present City standards that were not necessarily incorporated at the time. Staff recommended that the Plar~rting Commission make the Endings on pages 6 through 8 Findings ] through 7J of the staff report and make the findings that the proposed modification of PiJD-OS is covered by the final environmental impact report, as approved by the City Council under the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; make the findings for the major moditicari ott of the approved PUD development plait, acid recoininend approval of PUD-OS-1M, subject to the Exhibit B, drag conditions of approval. Staff drew the Commission's attention to the standard condition that all of the previous condition of PUD-OS would remain in place as part of the project. Commissioner Arkin noted that he was concerned about the time of buildout and requested clarification of the applicant's intentions regarding buildout. He noted that the Planning Commission looked at the design and materials of the units very carefully and PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 10, 2005 Yage 11 of 19