My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072705
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 072705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:21:31 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:45:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/27/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 072705
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
provide screening between the houses, particularly for the deck- He also proposed that <br />frosted glass be used for the transom window and that a wall be required on the side of <br />the deck that faces the Crofton home to direct the view from the deck to the rear of the <br />Diaz's yard rather than to the Croftons' backyard. He further requested that should the <br />addition be approved, the Croftons be allowed to install a seven-foot tall fence for <br />privacy~ <br />Mr_ Crofton questioned Condition No. 6, which required the applicant to use the same <br />materials as those of the existing residence- He noted that the Diaz's home has shake <br />roof but the addition would use composition roof- He also inquired if Mr_ Diaz, who is <br />an engineer, can approve his own plans, and noted that the site plan does not show what <br />trees would be actually removed. <br />Ms_ Nancy Cro Ron, 4757 Peaceful Lane, stated that she concurred with her husband's <br />statements. She requested that Condition No. 7 be amended to exclude Saturday from <br />the allowed construction days, thereby limiting construction days to Monday through <br />Friday. <br />Bob and Joyce Diaz, 4769 Peaceful Lane, stated that, in response to Mr. Crofton's <br />privacy concern, the addition would provide a sufficient amount of privacy. He noted <br />that half of the windows currently facing the CroRons' residence will be eliminated with <br />the addition. He then showed some photographs on the screen and explained the <br />proposed additions in detail- He noted that the existing deck which overlooks the entire <br />Cro Ron backyard has been part of the 20-year-old house and that this would now be <br />enclosed to build an exercise room, and a new deck farther out but in the same elevation <br />would be added to preserve an existing window. <br />Joyce Diaz explained that the proposal is to enclose a notch in the garage to provide an <br />exercise room where the deck currently sits. Shc indicated that the new second-story <br />window is a clerestory window to be located six feet from the floor level, solely to <br />provide light in the room; the window on the first-floor would be at the approximate <br />height of the fence and, therefore, would not provide any view towards the Croftons' <br />backyard. She added the proposed deck well be a private deck and not for entertaining. <br />She stated that the City's Landscape Architect was aware that three trees were to be <br />removed for the addition- She indicated that one of the trees is actually outside the <br />construction area but too close to the project such that it will eventually die because its <br />roots will need to be cut. <br />Ms_ Diaz informed the Commission that the negative feelings between the neighbors go <br />both ways- She noted that their proposed addition is small and they have plenty of trees. <br />She added that she did not feel their project is a significant imposition on the C=ro Bons <br />and would have no real impact on them. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 27, 2005 Page 21 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.