My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052505
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 052505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:21:01 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:27:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 052505
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
__.. Doug Sutton wished to address the issue of property value and noted that in the last three years, <br />the value of their property has risen by 50 percent I-Ic believed that the quality of the California <br />Distinguished Schools would also raise the property values; he didn't believe people should be <br />too concerned about their property values. <br />Patricia Sutton noted that she informed the neighbors that she did not take care of older children <br />and did not waxit to have up to eight children. She liked taking care of babies, and noted. that the <br />licensing must allow up to 14 children by State law. She noted that she would not have <br />14 nine-year-old children, which would run counter to State law. She noted that she only <br />intended to add two children. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that if a daycare licensed for eight children had nine children in the <br />home during a State inspection, the operator would lose the daycare license. <br />Mrs_ Sutton noted that she was very careful to adhere to State law. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank whether she would be willing to voluntarily <br />limit the number of children to ten, Mrs. Sutton contrmed that she would. <br />Mr_ Sutton stated that lze asked his wife that question earlier, and she had replied that she was not <br />willing to do so_ He added that, however, Mrs. Sutton. was free to change her mind. <br />THF_ PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas whether the City could impose a condition <br />limiting the number of children, Ms. Nerland confirmed that would not be possible and that State <br />law and det3nitions pre-empted City law. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin whether the City would limit the number of <br />drop-offs and pick-ups per day, Ms_ Decker replied that any condition must be enforceable to a <br />degree. She noted that would be very difficult to regulate. <br />Commissioner Fox advised that she lived within 300 feet of a large family daycare. home that she <br />did not realize was there. <br />Coxr~missioner Fox suggested that dropt>fl and pick-up traffic be directed so they enter the north <br />end of the street and that a map be distributed to the customers. She also suggested that a <br />condition be added that crying children be brought inside. She would like the City, rather than <br />the applicant, develop the good neighbor guidelines so it would be consistent with other <br />guidelines in the City_ <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Bla rxk regarding the video takerx by tha neighbors, <br />Ms_ Nerland replied that the police chief was concerned that the children's identities and <br />schedules could be shown in a public forum without the parents' consent. It was viewed <br />privately by staff <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 25, 2005 Page 18 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.