Laserfiche WebLink
and improve our water quality, our energy resources, our air quality, our <br />environmental sensitivity. We want to continue to minimize any health and safety <br />hazards. Acknowledging our relationship to the region, we seek to work with <br />their governments to solve common problems. The City's future, this vision, will <br />depend upon maintaining our balanced budget and using our I3nancial resources <br />wisely. Finally, we want to continue to promote civic participation emphasizing <br />the "Community of Character" principles of respect, responsibility, compassion, <br />self-discipline, honesty, and integrity. <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that the sentence on the sixth full paragraph on page 6 <br />should be modified. to read as follows: "Commissioner Roberts expressed concern that <br />even a solid fence would ra>c block the hammerhead turn and the car lights-" <br />Co~rimissioner Roberts advised that Condition No. 4 of the motion on the fourth <br />paragraph of page 7 should he changed to read as follows: "Additional landscape shall <br />be added and submitted to the Planning Director for review and -approval and should <br />camouflage the fence." <br />Commissioner Roberts inquired whether the Roll Call Vote for YCUP-138 Jennifer <br />Shen ~/Little Ivy Leaaue, on page 8 was correct- Clotamissioner Arkin advised that he <br />voted "No" with Commissioner Blank. The vote was three "ayes" and two "noes." <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that the Following sentence be added at the end of <br />paragraph 4 of page 12: "Mr. Brei/sing, howevc r, did have the srgres removed" <br />Commissioner Fox advised that the sentence on the second paragraph of page 8 should be <br />revised to read as follows: ... the landscaping plan would not obscure the view up the <br />hill." <br />Ms. Decker stated that the motion for PUD-99-O1-3M Alameda New Communities, on <br />paragraph four of page 7 should be corrected to reflect the Commission's additional <br />revision to staff's conditions of approval to not permit lattice in the fencing. <br />The minutes were approved as corrected- <br />3_ MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO <br />ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS <br />NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA_ <br />There were none. <br />4_ REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Commissioner Fox requested that because of the number of public speakers in <br />attendance, Item 8.c._ PDR-391/PCUP-118_ St_ Clare's Enisconal Church, be heard after <br />Item S.a._ PUD-37_ Ron Winter. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 11, 2005 Yage 2 of 16 <br />