PC 020905 - Laserfiche WebLink

G'ommissioner Roberts advised that there was a typographical error in modification no- 1 of the motion on page 5; it should read as follows: "Revise Condition No. 1 6 to indicate that the six-inch vertical concrete- .. _" Commissioner Fox advised that the last paragraph on page 15 should be changed to read as follows: "Commissioner Fox inquired whether the Code Enforcement Ofi-icer could perform a site visit on Just Tires; she believed that the signs on the window did not rc_fZect the Ptanning Commission 's vote to attow onty two out of the three signs- Co be ptczced in the window and that there was --~.xcess sign -coverage si-g~s on the window-" The minutes were approved as corrected_ 3_ MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA_ Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, noted that the Future Planning Calendar listed the Spotorno project as in the North Sycamore Specific Plan- She would support the City if it wished to move the 79 homes to the North Sycamore Specific Plan but added that they were included in the Happy Valley Specific Plan area- It also noted that the work session was listed as being scheduled for February 16, 2005 but that no Happy Valley resident had been notified of that special meeting- She understood that the reason was that the non-occupied but recently sold Summerhill/Sycamore Heights residents had to be notified, but that the developer/sales people refused to give the addresses of those residents- Because this was a General Plan Amendment request and the Happy Valley Specific Plan modification was at stake, she believed that the Happy Valley residents should receive more than one week's notice. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts whether the notices had gone out, Mr. Pavan replied that he was unable to answer the question at this time- He confirmed Ms_ Kawaihau's statement that the noticing had been held up so that the Summerhill residents could be notified- As soon as that information was provided, the notices did go out immediately- Ms. Decker noted that staff became aware of the noticing delay and that it was not completed appropriately; however, the scoping session would be held on February 16, 2005 as advertised to receive public comment and concerns- "The scoping session would then be continued to a later date, with some guidance and direction from the Commission; additional notification would be provided to include the Happy Valley residents- In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding the incorrect identification of the session as part of the North Sycamore Specific Plan, Mr. Pavan replied that would be corrected. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2005 Page 2 of 22