Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />, <br /> <br />Staff Comment: The IUC Guidelines anticipate various ratios if the IUC's are not used for <br />"like for like" housing. While it is difficult to quantify specific ratios without the benefit <br />of a proposed development plan, the developer requested ratios are consistent with those <br />discussed previously by the Council. As an alternative to the above ratios, staff could draft <br />language indicating the above ratios are anticipated but that a fmal decision is subject to a <br />developrnent plan. <br /> <br />The Amendment #1 to the Affordable Housing Agreement (Attachment 1) reflects the <br />recommendations included above. <br /> <br />IMPACT TO PUSD <br /> <br />As part of the IUC review process in September 2003, the City-PUSD Liaison Committee <br />reviewed potential impacts that mc's may have on the Option Agreement with the PUSD and <br />Ponderosa. The Option Agreement provides the PUSD an option to purchase a 23-acre site <br />for the developrnent of a new school and sets forth the method for determining the sales price. <br />Of primary concern is the fact that the issuance of credits could affect the appraised value of <br />the site if the PUSD exercises its option to purchase the property. The price of the land is <br />determined by an appraisal of the property. As a result, if the developer's request for IUC's is <br />approved, the property would be appraised assuming a residential project with 100% market <br />nnits. If the IUC's are not approved, the appraised value would be based on a residential <br />project with a mix of market and affordable units. Because the 100% market project would <br />most likely appraise at a value that is higher than a mixed rnarket/affordable development, the <br />price the PUSD would have to pay for the property would be higher. <br /> <br />After meeting with City staff, PUSD staff met with Ponderosa to explore options to mitigate <br />the impact the issuance of credits would have on the Option Agreement. As an outcome of <br />these discussions, at its meeting of October 14, the PUSD Board affirmed that the appraisal <br />process should be conducted as if the property would be developed with a mix of affordable <br />and market housing consistent with the City Inc1usionary Zoning Ordinance. Attached for <br />Council review (Attachment 5) is a copy of a draft amendment to the Option Agreement <br />addressing this matter. Staff understanding is this Amendment has been approved by the <br />school district and that it will be adopted if the Council approves the request for IUCs. <br />Because the City is not a part to the Option Agreement, no approval is required by the City. <br /> <br />SR:04:260 <br />Page 8 <br />