My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:052
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2006 3:51:31 PM
Creation date
2/2/2006 3:39:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:052
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />, <br /> <br />Staff Comment: The IUC Guidelines anticipate various ratios if the IUC's are not used for <br />"like for like" housing. While it is difficult to quantify specific ratios without the benefit <br />of a proposed development plan, the developer requested ratios are consistent with those <br />discussed previously by the Council. As an alternative to the above ratios, staff could draft <br />language indicating the above ratios are anticipated but that a fmal decision is subject to a <br />developrnent plan. <br /> <br />The Amendment #1 to the Affordable Housing Agreement (Attachment 1) reflects the <br />recommendations included above. <br /> <br />IMPACT TO PUSD <br /> <br />As part of the IUC review process in September 2003, the City-PUSD Liaison Committee <br />reviewed potential impacts that mc's may have on the Option Agreement with the PUSD and <br />Ponderosa. The Option Agreement provides the PUSD an option to purchase a 23-acre site <br />for the developrnent of a new school and sets forth the method for determining the sales price. <br />Of primary concern is the fact that the issuance of credits could affect the appraised value of <br />the site if the PUSD exercises its option to purchase the property. The price of the land is <br />determined by an appraisal of the property. As a result, if the developer's request for IUC's is <br />approved, the property would be appraised assuming a residential project with 100% market <br />nnits. If the IUC's are not approved, the appraised value would be based on a residential <br />project with a mix of market and affordable units. Because the 100% market project would <br />most likely appraise at a value that is higher than a mixed rnarket/affordable development, the <br />price the PUSD would have to pay for the property would be higher. <br /> <br />After meeting with City staff, PUSD staff met with Ponderosa to explore options to mitigate <br />the impact the issuance of credits would have on the Option Agreement. As an outcome of <br />these discussions, at its meeting of October 14, the PUSD Board affirmed that the appraisal <br />process should be conducted as if the property would be developed with a mix of affordable <br />and market housing consistent with the City Inc1usionary Zoning Ordinance. Attached for <br />Council review (Attachment 5) is a copy of a draft amendment to the Option Agreement <br />addressing this matter. Staff understanding is this Amendment has been approved by the <br />school district and that it will be adopted if the Council approves the request for IUCs. <br />Because the City is not a part to the Option Agreement, no approval is required by the City. <br /> <br />SR:04:260 <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.