Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It should be noted that the IUC Guidelines do not require a developer to identify a specific <br />site or development where the IUC's will be used when making its request for approval of <br />IUC's. However, the Council does have the latitude to designate a specific site and this <br />action can occur as part of its initial review or during the five years that the developer may <br />use the IUC's. As a result, the decision to use the credits on a site other then the PUSD <br />optioned site is a "policy" decision subject to Council discretion. <br /> <br />Staff recognizes the developer would like the opportunity to use the IUC's at any site <br />approved by the Council and that its previous recommendation did not restrict the IUC's to <br />the Busch site. However, as a result of comments made during the previous review for <br />these IUC's and general comments rnade during the review process for adopting the IUC <br />Guidelines, staff has changed its recommendation to reflect that these IUC's should be <br />linked to the Busch Property to assure there is a nexus between the affordable units and the <br />ultimate development of the Busch site. Allowing the developer to use them at another site <br />or sites, will create difficulties in assessing the nexus, including the value of the fee <br />waivers granted for the Busch site, between the Bush affordable units and an unrelated site. <br />This situation occurs in part, because the request for IUCs was not part of the initial <br />project review and as a result, staff and Council did not have the opportunity to fully assess <br />the impact of approving IUC's. Nevertheless, staff recognizes the developer's viewpoint <br />that because any future development at an alternative site is subject to Council review, the <br />Council retains the authority to deny the IUC's if it determines the conditions and features <br />of the alternate site and development do not meet Council criteria. <br /> <br />. A total of 51 IUC's may be applied to a development on the 23-acre PUSD optioned site <br />provided the total ratio of affordable housing for the entire 363-unit development and any <br />subsequent units will have a minimum of 24% affordable units. <br /> <br />Staff Comment: The initial Busch property PUD approval required that 24 % of the total <br />units be affordable and as a result, staff recommends this ratio, which exceeds the <br />percentage of affordable units required in the IZO, be extended to future development on <br />the Busch site. As a result if the developer proposes 200 units on the 23-acre site, a total <br />of 48 are required to be affordable. As an alternative, the Council could require that any <br />future development be consistent with 15% multi family and 20% ownership included in <br />the IZO. <br /> <br />. Any IUC's would be applied ill accordance with the following ratios: <br /> <br />>- If used on a multi-family development: llUC for each affordable unit required. <br />>- If used for a condo/townhome: 1.5 IUC's for each affordable unit required. <br />>- If used for a senior housing single-family unit: 1.5 lUC's for each affordable unit <br />required. <br />>- If used for a single-family housing: 2 IUC's for each affordable units required. <br /> <br />SR:04:260 <br />Page 7 <br />