SR 06:033 - Laserfiche WebLink

Atten: Rosalind Rondash Assistant Planner We have received and reviewed the 'Revised narrative for Application for a Large Family Daycare' dated November 28, 2005 that is requesting for approval in our private neighborhood. After careful consideration, we continue to refuse support for, and will not accept approval of the Subject application for the reasons contained in our original correspondence; and, additionally (addressing certain specific points contained in the Revised narrative): 1. Parking Facility; there is NOT adequate parking for 3 cars curbside to the residence/place of the proposed business. To comply with our neighborhood Association CC&Rs, owner & guest street parking is limited to directly in front of each owners' home (unless specific permission is obtained from and granted by the neighboring residence). Due to this being a high-density neighborhood, each residence is obviously very closely spaced. The maximum amount of cars each residence can accommodate to park directly in front of their own property (without blocking the garage/driveway)is: 1. I would request that the applicant provide proof otherwise. Additionally, the 'common area' parking (such as that in front of or behind the clubhouse as mentioned by the applicant) is paid for, insured, and maintained by the association (from monthly dues collected by the residences of the community), and available to be used by residences and their guests. The neighborhood Association does not pay for and maintain any common area to support small businesses nor their clients. 2. Noise Level: Due to this being a high-density neighborhood, our Association regulation forbid an significant activity having the potential to generate excessive or unusual noise to occur no earlier that 8AM (any noise generated by a business should be considered 'unusual' for a high-density residence community). The Working hours stated in the Application is in violation of the regulation. Additionally, there is no such existence as a ' ... large back yard..' (as phrased by the applicant) in this high-density neighborhood. 3. As mentioned in our prior correspondence that also objects to this application, we, as owners/residents and members of the Association, are not willing to absorb the expenses/replacement/maintenance costs and otherwise additional 'wear and tear' that the vehicle and usage traffic that clients/customers will cause on out streets and all other common areas for this community (which are our all our Association's private responsibility). Additionally, we will not support/agree to/accept any potential increased liability that could result from possible accident or injury that may occur in any 'common' area of the community form clients/customers or employees/assistants of the Subject business. Respectfully submitted by: Craig and Penny Taylor 5157 Genovesio Dr Pleasanton, CA 94588 16 (E-MAIL 2) Date of e-mail: Name of contact: Address of contact: Status: Decmeber 10, 2005 Alex Huang 5035 Porta Rossa Opposed E-mail: