SR 06:033 - Laserfiche WebLink

o Thinks that the ilPplicant should be required to use a bus/van to transport children outside the development for outdoor playtime so that neighbors are not disturbed by the noise. . Traffic: o AM traffic for the neighborhood residents merges with the surrounding neighborhood traffic and the entry of the area. Additional cars for the daycare will add to the existing problem. This impact is not just felt by the neighbor of the applicant, but also by the whole development and the neighboring development. . Parking: o Parking provided for each home is limited. Parking could be an issue. . Revised narrative: o Feels that the drop-off and pick-up schedule, parking and activities will not work the way the applicant has described. ~~------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 Date of phone call: Name of caller: Phone No.: Address of caller: Status: December 6, 2005 iiiIiiiiiI none given Opposed Comments: . Revised narrative: o Feel that the applicant is not telling the truth. Feels that the applicant is just trying to say things to get his way. o Told the neighborhood that they only wanted 10 children, and then they applied for 14. Now they want 11 children. . The applicant has threatened to sue anyone apposing him. . Traffic: o Traffic is already an issue and will only get worse with this approval. . Position: o Did not speak out against the application at first, but sees now that the applicant will keep lying until he gets his way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 (Phone and E-MAIL ) Date of phone call: Name of caller: Phone No.: Address of caller: Status: December 6, 2005 -- none given Opposed Comments: . Noise: o The homes are actually really close together and backyards are small. . Parking: