My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:034
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2006 12:04:12 PM
Creation date
1/13/2006 12:03:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:034
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A small percentage (about 5%) of residents receive assistance with daily activities such as <br />bathing, dressing, etc. <br /> <br />A small percentage (about 7%) receive assistance with scheduling medical appointments and <br />receive transportation for these appointments. <br /> <br />Similar Local Developments <br /> <br />If approved, the proposed development will be the first in Pleasanton and, as a result, there is no <br />precedent involving this type of project upon which to base a decision. Some existing projects <br />have specific elements of the proposed CCRC and may be used to help formulate a decision. <br />For example, the 70 room Eden Villa assisted living facility on Mohr Avenue was developed on <br />commercially-designated property and the recently approved assisted-living facility to be <br />located at 100 Junipero Street is on land designated High Density Residential; neither project <br />was counted against the housing cap. <br /> <br />Based on the above, it seems reasonable that the proposed 133 assisted and skilled nursing units <br />in the proposed development should unquestionably be viewed as commercial units not subject <br />to the housing cap. <br /> <br />However, there is no clear way of viewing the remaining 690 apartment and villa style units <br />(that will comprise the bulk of the development). In large part, a decision to view these as <br />residential or commercial units depends on the weight one places on unique aspects of the <br />development. If more weight is placed on the benefit of independence over service and if the <br />architectural design is considered, the units may be more likely viewed as residential subject to <br />the growth cap. If more weight is placed on the fact that residents will enter into a service <br />contract, that the units are subject to State regulatory requirements, and that residents will <br />receive a continuum of care opportunities, then the units are more likely to be viewed as part of <br />a commercial development not subject to the cap. <br /> <br />While this report is not intended to provide the status/analysis of existing or future residential <br />units that may impact the growth cap, staff has provided information previously indicating there <br />are currently 27,317 existing, under construction or existing units in the City at this time. As a <br />result, a decision characterizing 690 units as residential will impact Council decisions related to <br />proposed future residential development being discussed for Hacienda Business Park, and the <br />Stoneridge Mall BART station. A Summary of development in the City is as follows: <br /> <br />SR 06:034 <br />Page 5 of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.