Laserfiche WebLink
<br />uses_ He believed the applican.t: vvould consider a space at t:he pump islan.d t:o be used as a <br />parking space vvhile they driver shopped at the cOr1venience store. Hovvever" he noted that <br />people often patronized the larger stores vvithout buying gas. <br /> <br />lVfr. Iserson noted that the applicant proposed the placement of vegetative filter svvales <br />along the perimeter" vvhich staff supported. I-.Ic displayed a drivevvay easement on Utah <br />Street that could be eliminated.,. vvhich ""as not a necessary access point_ Sta:f'l:- developed <br />an alt:ernative design plan (Exhibit: :8) to be considered for the projects ent:ran.ce_ He <br />acknovvledged that it reduced the number of pumps from ten to eight" but st:aff believed <br />that vvas typical for other service stations in Pleasant:on. <br /> <br />1'V1:r. Iserson noted that: st:aff developed an. al temati ve for the car-drying area_ <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts believed that at least four lanes vvould be necessary to <br />accommodat:e those cars. <br /> <br />I\I1.r. .lserson noted that stafT"s design for that area did accomn""lodat:e four lan.es" a.n.d that <br />there vvas an opportrmity to plant: some landscaping in that area,. as vvelL <br /> <br />1'V1:r. lserson believed there may be a conflict vvith the 1'V1:cDonald"s,. and believed that there <br />vvere restrict:ions for other food uses. He noted t:hat: parking for the caTvvash V\Tas <br />sufficient" a.n.d added that t:here vvas no landscape plan. vvith the exception of a conceptual <br />plan for the site plan.. :I-Ie displayed the design for the service station nnd the con.ven.ience <br />store", a.n.d noted that the idea 'VVas to complement the architecture of the 1'V1:cDonald"'s <br />rest:auran.t next door. Staff believed t:hat direction. made sen.se; that decision vvould be the <br />Commission'" s_ Staff strongly recommended t:hat the striped areas be deleted from t:he <br />:front elevation,. and t:hat: the lighting along the edges of the canopy be elimin..ated. The <br />rear of the building V\fa.s somevvhat blank" but there vvas a.jog in the building. He <br />suggested that landscaping be added to the rear of the building to screen it. <br /> <br />1\.I1r. lserson suggested that the front vvindovvs of the convenience market be recessed", and <br />that vvindovvs be added to the gift shop area of t:he carvvash building. He recommended <br />that a tile band be used as a decorative material on t:he carvvash building,. and lloted that <br />the arches screened the entrance. Staff discouraged signage at the back 01-- t:he car vvash" <br />and suggested the use of tvvo building signs a.n.d a monument sign on 'lVyoming Street. <br /> <br />Il""l. response to an in.quiry by Commission.er S"L1-11iV'"an" l"'vIr_ Iserson. confirmed that tl"1ese <br />vvere conditional uses in the PUD" vvhich required that findings must be made Tor them to <br />be approved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan inquired vvhether the Commission could deny t:he use if it found <br />the conditional use permit did not meet the intent of the General Plan related to the <br />aesthetic considerations for gat:evvays to the City. 1'V1:s. Nerland noted that staffvvould <br />vvork vvit:h t:he Commission vvith respect to those details. <br /> <br />PLANl'-rING CC>lVIlVIISSIC>N lVIINUTES <br /> <br />C>ctober 22, 2003 <br /> <br />Page 1 0 <br /> <br />------r'..- --r- <br /> <br />. -,---- <br />