PC 092403 - Laserfiche WebLink

II""l. response to an inquiry by Comn""1issioner Sullivan" l\I1r_ Iserson advised that the Plaru.-:til-:tg CommissioI1 may sugges1: alter-:nativcs as V'Vcll_ I--:l:e r101:ed that. vari<..">us IY1eaSLlres lT1ay be ta..ken to reduce el-:tvironmental impacts" such as reducing gradings or moving l""l.ollses_ Greg Perkins." 880 Sun""1mit Creek Lane" expressed COl""l.Cern about the disclosLlre l:>y Ci-reel'1briar,. a1"1d noted tl'1at they clid not receive speci:f"ic il""l.1orrnatiorl about the future developlT1ent plans vvhen they bought their hCH""1""l.e. He .noted that vvas a false statement" and believed tl'1at tl""l.e agent.s vvere a'V'Vare o:f-the developrnent plans. In response to al-:t inquiry by COl'1'1r1'1issioner 1V1aas,. 1'\/lr. l>erkins noted that l'1e vovould have to search thro"L1.gh ll""1al""1Y documents to contJrrn. tl'1at he l""l.ad that: disclosure statement_ :I'\.t1r. Perkins noted that the ten trips per l""1ousehold vvasheavily uI-:lderestin.,ated,. al"1d noted tl,at 1,,500 trips per day tra.nslated to 150 trips per hour_ He vvitnessed several near-- accidents at the blind corner near SUI""l.Set Creek" vvhich he stated 'VVas a very dal-:lgerous area_ He vvas I-:t01. a'V'Vare tl""1at a develoPlT'lent 01 this n.'1agnitude vvas being built" a.n.d V\Tas told that Greenbriar did not knoV\T vvl'1at vvas being put in_ In response to an inquiry by COIT11T1issioner lVlaas,. J'V1r. Perkins noted that I""1C vvas 1""l.0'\A1 a.vvare of the :future construction of NeV\T Cities_ Ken Czaja" 1141 Lund Ranch Road" believed tl-:tat the nUIT1ber o-t-homes in tl'1e development vvas too high,. and noted that the General Plan midpoint vvas 82 l-:toI11es. He noted tl-:lat tl-:le n..urnber of homes vvould have a negative impact on tra:fI"ic and noise,. beca"L1-se oftl""1e hovvl-shaped area. He noted that there vvas no gree.n helt connectiOl'1 vvitl'1 Nevv Cities as tl'1ere vvas vvith Ventana Hills. He noted that the road extension appeared to go to a potential nevv development_ lV1r_ Tserson n.oted th.at it '-Vas a connection to tl""l.e Foley property,. vvhicl""l. '\.Vas currently "L1.sed for cattle ral'1chil'1g_ 1\/Ir_ Czaja il'1quired about the impact on tJ'1e vvater f10vv to the creek,. especially by l""1is property. l-Ie believed tl-:tat '-Vas subject to serious erosion problcn'1s. He strol'1gly objected to tl'1e possibility of- building hon'1es on the ridges,. and noted tl'1at it V\Tould l'1ave darnage tl"1e: visual and aesthetic irnpacts. I-Ie vvas concerned that 400 trees" including 200 l"1critage trees" on the hillside vvould be destroyed" vvhich hebclieved vvas out of proportiOl""1. He l'1oted that the grading vvas massive" and that the hillside vvould be devastated by tl"1e cut and fill operation..s_ In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin" Fritz Geier noted tha.t in additiol"1 to tl-:te letters received" the scoping process." and the con1..mcnt.s by the Commission V\Tould be incorporated into the EIR analysis_ He noted that the City provided a list or ten. issues" and if" more issues vvere raised." he vvould discuss their addition vvith the City. PLANNING COlVllVlISSION lVIIN~TTES Scptcn..ber 24, 2003 Page 1 1 "-r