Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tl"1e more efIicient use of existing lots" rather than.. the construction of an expen.sive and <br />unsightly parking structure. I-Ie supported the pu.rs1...1-it of a TSlVf program for L>o-vvntoV'Vrl <br />for a more long-term solution. <br /> <br />TI-IE PUBLIC I-IEARING ~AS CLOSED. <br /> <br />COImmissiOlner I<::ameny mOlved t:0I recommend approval 0..... PRZ-22 t:0I the Cit:y <br />Cou.n.cil as shovvn in Exhibit: A. <br />COImmissioner JVIaas secOlnded t:he mot:iOln. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioners ~rkin,. Kameny,. 1V:laas", Roberts,. and Sullivan <br />None <br />~one <br />~one <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2003-40 vvas entered and adopted as motion.ed_ <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny left the meeting Tollo'-Villg the vote. <br /> <br />f. PUD-31~ Cit:v of Pleasant:OIn <br />~pplication :for a comprehensive master Planned Unit Development (PUr>) <br />development plan to establish development standards and design guidelines for all <br />lots less than six (6) acres in size that are located in the PUr> - Semi-Rural <br />DC1"1sity R.esideo-tial (SRI:>R)-zolled Subarea o:f-the IIappy Valley Specific Plan_ <br /> <br />1\/1r. I serson sumrn..ari:z:ed the starr report., a1"1d 1'1oted that the l'v'faster PUD vvould set the <br />standards Tor developlT1ent,. eliminating tl""l.e n..ced for an individual PUr::> devclopn~cnt plan <br />in order to build a.r1 additional house on the lot. Language vvas takel'1 almost verbatim <br />:from the Specific Plan regardirlg permitted uses", conditional uscs,. development. <br />standards", an..d design guidelines. Sta:fT sent an early notice to surrouI-:tding property <br />ovvners il"1 1\I1ay" advising that the draft plan -vvas available. <br /> <br />Sta:f:t-recommended that tl-:te Planning Commission take the follovvil"1g actions: <br /> <br />1. Find that the proposed master pun development pla1"1 is consistent vvith <br />the General Plan and Happy Valley Specific Plan; <br />2. l'v1.ake the pun findings as listed in the starfreport::; <br />3 _ ~dopt a resolution recommending approval o:t- PUD-3 1 " as shoV'Vn. in <br />Exhibit A,. and Torvvarding the master PUD development plan to the City <br />Council :tor public hearing and revievv. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan" 1V:lr. Iserson confirmed that 279 <br />acres vvould be affected by this developlT1ent plan.. The Specific Plan.. called out a total of <br />69 additional units in the area :z:on.ed PUD-SR-DR_ Tl~e plan. only identi:tlcd the portion. or <br /> <br />PLANN"ING COl'v1l'v1ISSION 1V1INUTES Septernbcr 10. 2003 <br /> <br />Page 17 <br />