My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022603
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 022603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:39:40 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:01:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/26/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-022603
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Mr_ Iserson confirmed that if the <br />parking spaces filled up, that staFF would revisit the parking requirements~ <br />Commissioner Maas moved to approve PCUP-70 as recommended by staff~ <br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Maas, Kemeny, Roberts, and Sullivan <br />NOES= None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />Resolution No_ PC-2003-07 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />b_ PHUP-3, Terry Townsend <br />Application for a nonexeiript home occupation permit for an architect's office, <br />involving limited deliveries and meetings with clients, at an existing residence <br />located at 2564 Wilde Avenue. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit <br />Development -Low Density Residenti alb District. <br />Application withdrawn. <br />c_ PDR-265, Rick Thiele <br />Application for design review approval to allow the demolition of an existing <br />approximately 1 ,242-square-foot, one-story building and to allow the construction <br />of a new approximately 1,607-square-foot, two-story office building located at 252 <br />Spring Street. Zoning for the property is Central Commercial/Downtown <br />Revitalization District- <br />Mr. Iserson summarized the staff report- He noted that the existing building was in a <br />deteriorating condition, and that many of the original elements such as the windows have <br />been replaced over the years. It was originally constructed. as a residence, but used over the <br />years as an office. The proposed building would be an office for the property owner's <br />business; the new building would be in the same basic style as the existing building, which <br />would conform to the neighborhood character. The new building would be five feet taller <br />than the existing structure to iake advantage of the sloping lot; by raising it a few Feet, the <br />applicant would be able to add a usable floor in the back, and another that would be <br />accessed from the street grade. <br />The new building would use the same types of materials as the existing home, including <br />stucco siding, wood double-hung recessed windows, as well as ceramic the as a decorative <br />element. The applicant proposed two color schemes, both based on tan with different <br />accenting colors- Mr_ Iserson noted that a color board was available for the Commission's <br />perusal. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 2003 Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.