PC 012203 - Laserfiche WebLink

The Planning CJommission recessed. for a break at 8c25 p.m. Chairperson Arkin reconvened the meeting at 8c30 p.m. b_ YADR-552, Bart Price Application for modifications to the design review approval for the expansion of the existing residence and construction of an eight-foot high block wall located at 459 Adams Way_ Zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 Single-family Residential, 6,500 Square Foot Minimum Lot~_ Continued indefinitely. c_ YAP-43 (PADR-669, John Du~gat•) Appellants- James and Joanne Norman Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of an administrative design review application to construct additions to the existing dwelling at 3573 Kings Canyon Court consisting o£ 1J an approximately 33-square foot single-story addition on the north side of the existing garage; 2J an approximately 382-square foot single-story addition on the west ~front~, east gear), and north ~side~ elevations; and 3) an approximately 669-square foot second-story addition above the existing garage and family room- Zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 Single-family Residential, 6,500 Square Foot Minimum Loth. Mr_ Iserson summarized the staff report, and noted this was the third application within the past several years for additions to Mr_ Duggan's house. He noted that the main issue was a history of neighborhood concerns with the applicant's very slow progress in completing work on his home, resulting in the condition of the property. He advised that there were issues with regard to the applicant not obtaining a building permit for some work performed, the unsightly condition of the house and the property, and some unsafe conditions as a result of improvements started on the house that were never completed_ These issues led staff to condition the design review approval with reduced periods for the expiration of the design review in order to motivate the applicant to complete the work and to correct the unsafe conditions on the site- In October 2002, code enforcement began compliance hearings on this property, which were cancelled when the applicant submitted a new design review application. Staff wished to reach an agreement between the applicant and the neighbors. AL the last Zoning Administrator hearing of December 16, 2002, the applicant was riot present, but two neighbors, including the appellant, were in attendance- The neighbors reiterated their concerns that they had expressed during the last applications with regard to the ongoing issues. At that hearing, the Zoning Administrator approved the application for design review with a three month expiration date for the first phase first floor) of the application, and a six month expiration for the second phase garage and second floor). Other restrictions included the completion of the first floor before a building permit could be issued for the second story; the front porch must be completed before the first floor PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 22, 2003 Page 10