My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 010803
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 010803
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:39:12 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/8/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 010803
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
facilities would not be allowed. The Planning Commission will also consider the <br />Negative Declaration prepared for the proj ect_ <br />This item was continued to January 22, 2003_ <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the asphalt plant was causing a great deal of <br />consternation within the City. <br />Commissioner Kemeny inquired whether the new gym in the Rose Pavilion had received <br />City approval to commence operations. Mr_ Iserson replied that he would look into that <br />matter. If a use permit was required, they didn't obtain one. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr_ Iserson replied that the City <br />Council denied the Toby's appeal and that the owner did not attend after appealing. He <br />added that they had gone out of business- <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas, Mr_ Iserson confirmed that the Marque <br />had closed. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sedlak regarding the DVD vending machine <br />_ near Trader Joe's, Commissioner Roberts replied that she had already appealed it. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin, Mr. Iserson replied that the East Side <br />Study was on the pending list. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regarding the Stoneridge traffic study, Mr_ <br />Iserson replied that he did not have a date available. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan regarding removing the West Las <br />Positas interchange out of the General Plan as requested by City Council, Mr_ Iserson <br />advised that he did not have the status of that item, but would report to the Commissioners. <br />7n response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin, Mr_ Iserson advised that an appeal by a <br />Planning Commissioner may take place during the Commission meeting. A discussion <br />about the process ensued. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br />a_ Future Planning Calendar <br />Commissioner Maas inquired when the Valley Plaza karaoke item would be heard. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr_ Iserson replied that ha did not <br />know when the Eldercare Alliance matter would be heard again- He noted that they met a <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 8, 2003 Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.