PC 010803 - Laserfiche WebLink

neighborhood irieeting on November 21, 2002, by a long-time Happy Valley resident, that particular road was discounted in the staff report in 1996_ She paraphrased the language from that staff report, citing grading, environmental, and economic factors. She added that it would not provide adequate emergency access. She then submitted a petition entitled: "Petition Against Study of Alternative By-Pass Road" She supported studying the original bypass road. Toni Daggett, 6034 Alisal Street, noted that he lived near Alternative 4 Moot of Spotorno Hill. He noted that he planned to build an in-law house on his property for his family. He had a problem with the Spotorno family suggesting that their property should be condemned. He noted that would take half of their property away, and would make their future plans impossible to pursue. He recommended the original bypass road, and would like alternatives 2 and 4 to be discounted_ I-Ie noted that the gate was a political issue, and suggested that if it were to be built, that it be placed near Sycamore Road and Alisal Street. Dee Liclican, 6748 Alisal, recommended that the original bypass road be studied. She expressed concern that economic feasibility will point the Commission to the final alternative, which used the emergency vehicle access as the main entrance to the golf course. Daryl Horan., 6330 Alisal, noted that she owned two parcels and Horan Lane_ She has been a Happy Valley resident for 29 years, and was very disturbed by Alternative 4_ She did not appreciate the neighbors thinking of bypass plans that will ruin her quality of life and her property values_ She supported the original bypass road, and did not want to be forced out of her neighborhood before she was ready to leave. Jay Lo Rhouse-Zeis, 6028 Alisal Street, noted that he lived next to the Daggetts, and expressed concern about Alternative 4_ He noted that the Planning Commission had the chance to save the City a signit3cant amount of money. He did not want to lose lot size, which would be smaller than that cited in the Specific Plan. He opposed the construction of a road 50 feet from his house, whereas the existing road lay more than 800 feet from his house_ He requested that the land that was incorporated into the City should be used for the bypass road and the City's golf course. He requested that his and his neighbors' lives not be disrupted, and supported the original bypass road plan. Dierdre Gipson, 6187 Alisal Street, supported Alternative 1, and was opposed to the possibility of increased traffic on Alisal Street. She noted that the original alternative affected one property owner, and the other alternatives affected multiple property owners. Vince Barletta, 6290 Laura Lame, appreciated The Planning Commission's concern in this matter. He stated that the annexation was voted down because it would decrease their quality of life, and detailed the history of the annexation. Mr. Barletta commented: "I also feel a little ashamed, because I sat up here in August and asked you to do this study, because people said we've always heard that the Upper Bypass Road couldn't be done, but _ _ _ indeed, the Bypass Road has been studied." He strongly urged the Planning Commission to recommend that the City build out the entire infrastructure to all the PLANNING COMMISSION MIN LITES January 8, 2003 Page 12