Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Comment T e Comment Dis osition <br />12. Encourage second units in Downtown Implementation of Downtown <br /> S ecific Plan <br />13. Front the future City office buildings on to Appropriate to consider this as <br /> Main Street part of Civic Center Master <br /> Plan. <br />14. Expand the Downtown commercial area to Not currently scheduled fo <br /> the east side of First Street discussion. Would be <br /> inconsistent with recently <br /> a roved DT Specific Plan. <br />As noted in the table, above, most of the frequently mentioned issues are either being dealt with <br />as part of the scheduled series of Joint Workshops on land use, or have been resolved through <br />other Specific Plans or projects. The only issues not covered are the issue related to reducing the <br />size of proposed larger homes, and reducing the housing cap, although reserving a portion of the <br />cap for future planning partially achieves this goal. The City Council should indicate if <br />discussion of these items should be scheduled. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />1. Provide direction to staff on the following issues: <br /> . Assisted living units and the residential cap <br /> . The definition of gross developable acreage for PUDs <br /> . Reserving residential units for a later time horizon under the Growth <br /> Management Program <br /> . Approaches to jobs/housing balance <br /> . Discussion of larger homes and reducing the housing cap <br />Resp.ectfully Submitted, <br />J ~ <br />Con, Director Nelson Fialho <br />Planning and Community Development City Manager <br />Attachment: <br /> I. Figure I: Selected Residential Development Sites with Slopes over 25 percent <br />X:\JaniceS\General Plan 2025\City Council reports\1129051and use.doc <br />SR 05:335 <br />Page 9 of9 <br />