My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:335
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2005 1:52:17 PM
Creation date
11/18/2005 1:50:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/29/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:335
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the transfer of development rights. The City Council has authorized staff to work with the <br />property owners and adjacent neighborhoods to discuss land use options for the area that are <br />mutually beneficial to area residents and the property owners, while also maximizing the <br />preservation of open space in the South East Hills. The City Council and Planning Commission <br />will be kept informed as these discussions develop. <br />Land Use issues identified at earlier General Plan Community Meetings. In the fall of 2003, a <br />series of five community meetings was hosted by the Planning Commission with the objective of <br />providing an opportunity for early input into the General Plan process. At these meetings, <br />community members were invited to name issues to be addressed in the General Plan update. <br />The table below based on information from page 8 of the General Plan Update: Community <br />Meetings Summary Report of January 7, 2004. The table shows "substantial", "moderate" and <br />"limited" comments, meaning, those comments repeated, respectively, at least eleven times, <br />between five and ten times, and less than five times. The table also identifies those comments <br />currently being addressed by this series of Joint Workshops on Land Use. <br />Comment Tvpel Comment Disposition <br />Substantial Comments <br />1. Reduce the Housing Cap. Not specifically being <br /> discussed. <br />2. Build out housing according to the current See above. <br /> Housing Cap <br />3. Reduce the size of proposed larger homes. No discussion currently <br /> scheduled, but could be <br /> addressed at a later workshop. <br />4. Consider housing opportunities for the Discussed in Workshop #3 <br /> Hacienda Business Park <br />Moderate Comments <br />1. Maintain rural densities and rural life-styles in Density issue covered in this <br /> the outskirts of Pleasant on workshop; also currently <br /> addressed in General Plan and <br /> Specific Plans. <br />2. Redesignate the Lin and Lund Ranch II sites Will be discussed in Workshop <br /> to Open Space # 5; also facilitated discussion <br /> is ongoing as described in this <br /> Staff Report. <br />3. Reduce the density of housing permitted at Being discussed in context of <br /> the Lin and Lund Ranch II sites density calculation III this <br /> Workshop <br />4. Do not allow housing to develop in advance This is largely a process issue <br /> of school capacitv in terms of coordinating land <br />SR 05:335 <br />Page 7 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.