Laserfiche WebLink
<br />If, five years after the date of the second installment, there are funds that have not been spent, <br />BART will return those funds to the parties, on a pro rata basis if only a portion of the funds are <br />left, If, however, there are no funds (or the fund amount is less than what the parties have <br />funded), BART is under no obligation to repay the whole of the funded amounts, <br />The dollars that the City is committing under this Agreement is about the same as the property <br />tax revenues it was pledging in the prior MOU, Here, however, there is the possibility that the <br />City will be repaid where under the prior MOU that was not the agreement. And, should the <br />private development occur on the BART property, the City would retain all of the property tax <br />revenue it receives from such development. Accordingly, staff believes that this proposed <br />financial arrangement is more favorable than the arrangement in the 2000 MOD because there <br />are fewer unknowns (i.e" the amount of the commitment is fixed) and the existence of this <br />reserve will allow BART to obtain more favorable terms as to its bond issuance, <br />FISCAL IMP ACT <br />As to the sources for funding this commitment, staff will recommend that the City use its 20% <br />share of the Tri-Valley Transportation Fee; there are sufficient funds in that account for that <br />purpose, <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the Funding <br />Agreement in a final form as approved by the City Attorney, <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br />~~^ ~ !I1lcMIIl!;t-! <br />Susan Rossi Michael H. Roush Nelson Fialho <br />Finance Director City Attorney City Manager <br />Attachment <br />SR:05:309 <br />Page 3 <br /> ------"- <br />