Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> EDAW INC WORK PROGRAM <br /> TflANSIT-OflIENTED ~,PECIFIC PLAN <br /> FC'R T HE HAC I[NDA BUSIN ESS PARK <br />reinvented tran~il supportivc and livabl,.' Hacicnda THE PUBLIC REALM AND BUILT FORM <br />BI/siness Park' <br /> Our approach is based tln a belief that the quality of <br />And- urban spaces and their connectedness generate <br /> economic, social and environmental value by <br />Huw wilf IlC"W elcl/lents in Ihe orCIl be.st fit with and defining the spatial p<lttcrn of human life. We <br />contribute to existing dndopl/lenl /lnd uses UIJ-::iill.' Ilnd believe in the public realm as th<lt space in which <br />citywide? the social and cultural values of our societies can be <br /> most clearly expressed. We see this project as an <br />These questions are particularly significant to ideal situation in which we can pursue these ideals. <br />Hacienda because of both the need to cultivate the An interesting attribute of this project from the <br />mix of currently thriving uses and the risk of perspective of the public realm and built form V\'ill <br />creating a "transit-adjacent development" (or one come from establishing a hierarchical urban <br />which in simple terms is in close proximity to framework of place. <br />transit, but is in fact not transit supportive) rather <br />than a truly tr<lnsit-oriented development. The "hierarchy" refers to the decisions that will <br /> need to be made relative to the extent of change <br />The considerations necessary for addressing both of proposed and where and, in turn, how these are <br />these concerns arc similar, fundamentally focusing integrated \vith one another. It is likely that <br />on the location and density of new uses; mJlhple relatively little physical change may be proposed in <br />modes of mobility (pedestrian, bicycle, and auto); some places \vhile dramatic changes will be <br />and overall development form and character. proposed in others. Despite these differences, it is <br /> essential that the place be recognized as a cohesive <br />PLANNING RESOURCES whole. <br />The Consultant Team recognizes the wealth of <br />information and work that has already be~n <br />prepared for the area, which include: <br />0 Hacienda Business Park Land Use <br /> Modification Proposal; <br />0 Hacienda Business Park Opportunities; <br />0 Pleasanton Ceneral Plan; and <br />0 Land use studies and sta bon area plans <br /> prepared bv BART. <br />We plan to build on the existing i.nformation and <br />engage the Teams, City staff, and other Balboa Park BART Station Area Plan, SF <br />participants in a discussion on the strengths and <br />weaknesses of these efforts. We understand from the Haciellda Business Park <br />As each of the previously prepared plans is in I.iJ/zd LIse M()d~fiCi1tiO/J Proposal that there is the <br /> desire to establish a refined vision for ill! of <br />various stages of implementation, we believe we Hacienda, but special attention should be paid to <br />can learn mucD by gathering first-hand feedback three sub-areas within, including: <br />from those who have actually implement2d them. <br />This insight would be used to directly inform the 0 The BART Corridor; <br />preparation and content of the Specific Plan. 0 West Las Positas Boulevard; and <br /> 0 Ovvens Drive. <br /> (':) <br />