My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:258
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:258
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Conclusion <br />The additional information reinforces the recommendation from Staff to the Planning Commission. The <br />subject site: <br /> . Is an infilllot within the Downtown Specific Plan Area; <br /> . Is designed with architecture reflecting the design and development standards of the <br /> Downtown residential area; <br /> . The recommendations of Cannon Design Group enhance the architecture, but does not <br /> significantly change it; <br /> . The project blends into the downtown character and provides 'Main Street' consumers <br /> adding to the viability and success of the Downtown; <br /> . Provides for affordability by design providing a niche housing type for first time <br /> young professional and entry level individuals; <br /> . Is supported by the Housing Commission without decrease of the number of dwelling <br /> units; <br /> . Loss of heritage trees are mitigated on site by a 1.7:1 ratio providing 16 trees on a 0.26 <br /> ac site; <br /> . Adequate on site tandem parking providing three (3) spaces per detached single-family <br /> residential unit and two (2) spaces per attached multi- family residential unit. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff recommends the Planning Commission: <br />I) Find that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan, <br /> Downtown Specific Plan, and the purposes of the PUD ordinance; <br />2) Find that the Environmental Impact Report for the Downtown Specific Plan anticipated <br /> that a high density residential project would be located on the site therefore, no other <br /> environmental documentation is required; <br />3) Make the PUD findings numbers I through 7 identified in the staff report; <br />4) Adopt a resolution recommending approval of PUD- 37 to the City Council for a rezoning <br /> from RM-1500 to PUD-HDR and for development plan approval for a 6-unit residential <br /> development as shown on Exhibit A, subject to: <br /> a. Modified conditions of the May 11,2005 Planning Commission hearing; <br /> b. Modified in accordance with the peer review recommendations 1-7 as noted in this <br /> memorandum, excepting number 5, and that the plans will be revised to reflect those <br /> changes subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. <br />Attachments <br />1) Cannon Design Group peer review <br />2) Housing Commission minutes-June 16,2005 <br />3) Letter from the applicant <br />4) Planning Commission minutes-May 11, 2005 <br />5) Planning Commission staffreport (without exhibits) <br />6) Revised Conditions of Approval-Exhibit B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.