Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Peer Review <br />The Planning Commission requested the project be evaluated by the City's peer review <br />architect, Cannon Design Group. The peer review indicates that the project is well <br />designed overall and concentrated on suggestions for additional details that could be <br />added to enhance the proposed design, as follows: <br /> I) Provide more articulation on the belly band, or make it smaller; <br /> 2) Reduce the size of the trim at all sills and around the windows; <br /> 3) Add trim to the deck fronts to produce shadow lines; <br /> 4) Consider a planter and lattice to soften the deck divider; <br /> 5) Add garage doors with windows and detail the second story elevation <br /> above the garages with additional lattice and trellis on the St. John Street <br /> units; <br /> 6) Enlarge columns at porch elements; and, <br /> 7) Reduce window size on second floor at unit rear. <br />The applicant agreed to these suggestions with the exception of adding garage doors. <br />Staff agrees that garage doors would not be necessary and may cause the garages to be <br />used for storage instead of parking. <br />Housing Commission <br />The Planning Commission requested the item be reviewed and commented by the <br />Housing Commission. Staff notes that since the project has less than 15 units it is not <br />subject to the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. <br />On June 16,2005 staff presented the project to the Housing Commission. The Housing <br />Commission expressed support for the project as one that was affordable by design, <br />declared support for the proposed density, added that this is the type of project the City is <br />encouraging developers to build, and acknowledged the project was not subject to the <br />Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. The applicant was congratulated for his efforts and was <br />requested to return to provide the Commission with some numbers related to sales and <br />rents for units of this housing type. <br />Parking <br />The Planning Commission expressed concern related to parking, noting that the proposed <br />project could impact or reduce existing on-street parking currently serving the adjacent <br />commercial uses. <br />Residential developments are generally required to provide two on-site parking spaces per <br />dwelling unit. However, the Downtown Core Area Overlay District requires only I Y, <br />spaces per unit for rental units with two bedrooms. The proposed project consists of four <br />SR:05:258 <br />Page 5 <br />