My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:259
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:11 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:259
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALAMEDA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 03-096 <br /> <br />. _~_RESOLUTJON APPROYING VES'TI~Q_TENTA TIVE TRACT <br />MAP _ TRACT 7399, NORTHST AR CONSTIfUCTION AND-DEVEL-oPMENT-- <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 9,2003, the Planning Commission denied Vesting Tentative <br />Map 7399, the application ofNorthstar Construction and Development consisting <br />of: (1) 19 single-family lots within the 13.2-acre Low Density area; (2) a 12.4- <br />acre Hillside Residential/Open Space lot (Parcel A) containing the existing <br />Chrisman residence and associated accessory buildings; (3) three commonly- <br />owned space lots (Parcels B, C, and D) containing about 4.7 acres located at 1944 <br />Vineyard Avenue (Lot 23 in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan) and a <br />portion of 2200 Vineyard Avenue (Lot 22); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the property is zoned Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br />Residential/Hillside Residential/Open Space District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Northstar <br />Construction and Development submitted an appeal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the public was given the <br />opportUnity to comment on the proposed project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there are no new or changed circumstances which <br />require additional CEQA review of the project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council [mds that Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7399 is consistent with <br />the [mdings presented in the Planning Commission staff report dated June 11, <br />2003, and is in conformance with the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan and the <br />PUD development plan approved for this property. <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.