Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Medical Marijuana <br /> <br />California voters enacted Proposition 215, "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996" <br />("Act") to ensure that, without violating State laws regarding possession and cultivation of <br />manJuana, <br /> <br />"seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical <br />purposes where the medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a <br />physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of <br />marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, <br />arthritis, migraine, or other illness for which marijuana provides relief." <br /> <br />Under the Act, patients and primary caregivers are not subject to state criminal prosecution for <br />cultivation and personal possession of marijuana; however, they are not allowed to distribute it <br />to others or sell it at a profit. A "primary caregiver" is defined as an individual designated by a <br />seriously ill person who has "consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health or <br />safety" of that ill person. Patients and primary caregivers can associate "collectively or <br />cooperatively to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes." Fundamentally, the Act protects <br />personal medical use of marijuana, but not commercial use. <br /> <br />The concept of a medical marijuana "dispensary" serving as a "primary caregiver" to <br />many individuals is not a concept addressed in the Act. Nevertheless, there has been a <br />proliferation of such large-scale operations claiming to serve as "primary caregivers" for a large <br />numbers of individuals. This has lead to an increasing concentration of medical marijuana <br />dispensaries in certain areas and secondary impacts, such as increased criminal activity, <br />loitering, traffic and parking, which pose an immediate threat to the public health, safety and <br />welfare. (as discussed in the staffreport dated August 16,2005 and attachments) <br /> <br />Notwithstanding the lack of medical marijuana dispensaries, Pleasanton has been <br />impacted by the crime associated with these uses. As previously mentioned, juveniles have been <br />arrested in possession of marijuana that was obtained from a dispensary and resold. In July <br />2005, an employee of a medical marijuana dispensary in San Leandro left the business with <br />$135,000 in cash and brought the bag and money to his home in Pleasanton, where he became <br />the victim of a theft. This case is being actively worked by police detectives, consuming <br />resources and time, and represents a monetary loss that exceeds nearly every theft in <br />Pleasanton's history. <br /> <br />While recognizing the desire of the electorate in passing the Act, the California <br />Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 in 2003 to provide further regulations related to medical <br />marijuana, including an identification card program, limits on the amount of marijuana per <br />qualified patient, and confidentiality and privacy restrictions. However, these efforts fell short <br />of addressing the issue of the proliferation of medical marijuana dispensaries and have been <br /> <br />SR: 05:261 <br />Page 2 <br />