My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:253
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:253
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2011 2:48:58 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 12:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:253
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Plan and LAFCo's policies regarding annexationldetachment and concludes that they comply. <br />The surrounding property owners have been notified that this matter will be considered by the <br />City Council at its September 20 meeting. Council may initiate the annexation proceedings, as <br />recommended, or not. <br />If Council chooses for the annexationldetachment to proceed, the Council will need to adopt a <br />resolution formally initiating the annexationldetachment with LAFCo and agreeing to the <br />exchange of property taxes with Alameda County. <br />The annexationldetachment application is submitted to LAFCo staff for its review. Once <br />LAFCo staff is satisfied that all requirements have been completed, the matter is scheduled for a <br />public hearing for action by LAFCo. <br />LAFCo may approve the application with either revisions or conditions; it may also decide not <br />to approve the application. The annexationldetachment becomes effective when it is formally <br />recorded with Alameda County. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff recommends the Council adopt a resolution formally initiating the annexationldetachment <br />of the properties in question. <br />Staff also recommends Council adopt a resolution for a propery tax sharing agreement with the <br />County for the allocation of property taxes. Because the properties are either owned by the City <br />(and hence are tax exempt) or are valued low for tax purposes because of their use, the <br />allocation of property taxes is not a significant issue with this annexationldetachment. <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br />TiDir <br />Rob Wilson <br />Director of Public Works <br />Nelson Fialho <br />City Manager <br />Attachments: <br />Vicinity Map (Exhibit A) <br />Notice to Surrounding Property Owners (Exhibit B) <br />Draft Annexation Resolution (Exhibit C) <br />Draft Tax - Sharing Agreement Resolution (Exhibit D) <br />SR:05:253 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.