Laserfiche WebLink
Calming Program as a tool available for locations where speed reduction <br /> is desired on two-lane local residential streets or two-lane residential <br /> collector streets. <br /> <br /> Additionally, staff recommends adding radar speed signs to the toolbox. <br /> The radar speed signs are used regularly by the program and have had a <br /> positive response from the residents. The radar speed signs provide the <br /> driver an additional visual reminder of the speed of their vehicle. With <br /> the exception of speed lumps, radar speed signs are the most requested <br /> calming tool. <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In 1997 The City of Pleasanton began the demonstration Traffic Calming Project to address <br />traffic concerns expressed by local residents. The program was adopted by the City Council <br />in 1998 upon completion of the demonstration projects. The Traffic Calming Program <br />(Attachment A) is a two tier, resident-driven program. Tier I provides for quick response to <br />isolated problems by means of tools such as police enforcement, standard engineering <br />improvements (installation of additional speed limit signs, sight distance improvements, etc.) <br />or installation of a single traffic calming device. If residents do not observe improvement <br />through the functions of Tier I, then Tier II of the program is introduced to the residents. Tier <br />II is a more comprehensive, neighborhood approach. This Tier is initiated by a resident <br />petition demonstrating that at least 51% of the residences believe a comprehensive <br />Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program should be developed for their neighborhood. Tier II <br />includes additional data collection by staff and neighborhood meetings. At the first meeting, a <br />steering committee is formed to aid in the development of the comprehensive plan. Upon <br />design completion of the plan, it is shown to the neighborhood and needs to be supported by a <br />strong majority of the residents (2/3 by petition) before the plan is brought to the City Council <br />for final approval. <br /> <br />The various devices that may be used in the program are detailed in the Traffic Calming <br />Toolbox (Attachment B). Both the Traffic Calming Program and the Toolbox were designed to <br />be living documents that undergo changes as new methods and devices are implemented. <br />Over the last seven years, staff has received first-hand experience on the pros and cons of <br />many of the devices listed in the program and several that are not in the program. Staff found <br />that most of the devices included in the program are quite expensive and/or impact parking to <br />the extent that an installation of a device is not favorable to the residents. Staff realized that <br />lower cost and non-parking impact alternatives are needed in the toolbox. Staff has constantly <br />reviewed the state-of-the-art advances in traffic calming and implemented a few of these to <br />determine their effectiveness. Staff has conducted studies on several devices that meet the <br />SR:05:223 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />