Laserfiche WebLink
· ' ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> <br />mentioned before, contrary what Staff has been told, the church DOES have plans to <br />expand the existing preschool program. <br /> <br />Page 9. <br />How the staff believes expanding the preschool program would not have an impact, <br />especially after the problems with the existing program is illogical. They offer no <br />supporting evidence for this belief. At this point, I believe, the objectivity of the Staff <br />must be called into question. <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />The staff incorrectly concludes that church has addressed the concerns of the residents. <br />Only one issue has been resolved. <br /> <br />I completely disagree with the staff recommendations. This proposal should not be <br />approved in its present form. <br /> <br />Closing <br />This proposal has many negative impacts on the neighborhood and is not in compliance <br />with the General Plan. The church has been intransient on all points. That includes the <br />driveway until the current revision of the proposal. I believe the church has not been <br />truthful with either the city or the residents. I believe they have exhibited a behavior of <br />not fulfilling their promises. The church's attitude at the meetings was apparently that <br />the residents had an obligation to accede to every whim of the church that is embodied in <br />this project regardless of the negative impact to their neighborhood. I urge you to reject <br />this plan. <br /> <br />Thank you for your attention to this unpleasant matter. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> <br /> Carl W. Pretzel <br /> <br /> <br />