Laserfiche WebLink
the next twenty years. As a result, some beginning fund balances were determined to be <br /> greater than needed to support the long-term plans, and therefore current replacement <br /> accruals (charges to the departments) were reduced, resulting in a reduction of about $1.3 <br /> million to the Replacement Funds in 2005-06, and $665,000 in 2006-07. A similar <br /> approach has been used in prior years as part of the bi-annual update. <br /> <br /> Also, as part of this update and mentioned earlier, the Budget uses current dollars to <br /> prefund about $2 million of replacement accruals in 2004-05. This will then reduce <br /> Replacement contributions in 2005-06 to help smooth out other negative impacts on the <br /> budget, such as the additional loss of property tax revenue to the State in that year as part <br /> of the ERAF III shifts. <br /> <br /> In most cases, the annual funding levels have started to stabilize and will grow more in <br /> line with inflation. As a result, the City is able to not only achieve and maintain high <br /> standards of maintenance for its capital assets, but the replacement/renovation needs of <br /> the City are now being met on an ongoing basis without competing in the budget process <br /> against dollars needed in the CIP or diverting resources from ongoing operations or <br /> expanding services. However, staff would recommend that we continue reviewing the <br /> funding levels every two years as part of the budget process, to be able to adjust the <br /> annual contributions as factors change. For example, new facilities and parks will need <br /> to be added to the renovation programs as they come into use, thereby increasing costs <br /> over time. <br /> <br /> While some of the Replacement/Renovation Funds reflect large projected fund balances <br /> at of the end of this two year budget cycle (June 30, 2007), the cash flow analyses show <br /> that these fund balances will be needed in the future, both near and long term. <br /> <br /> The purpose of each of the Internal Service Funds and the adequacy of its fund balance <br /> are discussed in more depth in the Budget document. <br /> <br />E. LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON FIRE DEPARTMENT FUND <br /> <br /> In November of 1998, Pleasanton assumed personnel, payroll, accounting and liability <br /> risk management responsibilities for the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD). <br /> In 2001 Pleasanton also assumed Workers' Compensation Administration. <br /> <br /> Funding comes from the two cities based on an established cost sharing formula. Other <br /> joint revenues are also reflected in the LPFD Fund, but if received, they are credited back <br /> to the two cities at year-end. In addition, separate Funds have been established to <br /> account for LPFD Workers' Compensation, LPFD Retirees' Medical, and LPFD <br /> Information Systems Replacement. <br /> <br /> Pleasanton's share of the costs is also shown in the Fire section starting on page 91. In <br /> addition to LPFD shared costs, Pleasanton's budget also reflects costs for contracted <br /> dispatch service provided by Livermore, apparatus replacement accruals, gasoline and <br /> other miscellaneous costs. <br /> <br /> b-26 <br /> <br /> <br />