Laserfiche WebLink
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS <br /> <br />Recommended updates to the CIP are outlined in Appendix B. The Quarter 2 worksheets for each <br />of the five CIP categories are presented as well as the Adjusted Budget worksheets for each <br />category. Numbers in italics represent amendments and transfers already approved by Council. <br />Staff has reviewed each project and has recommended some transfers of balances from completed <br />projects to current projects as well as changes in project budgets due to changes in revenue sources. <br />Interest income projections have a net increase of $41,301. Developer fees projections show a net <br />decrease of $6,444,195 because the methodology for presenting them has changed. The previously <br />adopted FY05 Budget reflected the estimates for the developer fees expected to be collected during <br />the year. During this year's midyear review, the annual estimates have been reduced to the actual <br />developer fee revenue received during the 6 months from July through December 2004. The most <br />significant of the recommended changes in the Capital Improvement Funds are described as <br />follows: <br /> <br />In the Parks CIP (Quarter 2 adjustments pages B9-B 12), interest income estimates did not change. <br />The estimate for Park Dedication fees has been decreased by $2,909,972 due to the new <br />methodology explained above. Another large adjustment is taking out the "Transfer to Next Year's <br />Revenue" at midyear for the Park Dedication fees. This is only being done in the Parks CIP. The <br />reason for this is to be able to pay back the General Fund in FY04-05 the balance of the money <br />($1,830,333) it advanced to the Golf project to purchase land. This quarter, both the revenue and <br />the expenditure budgets for the "Bemal Creek Restoration" project are being reduced by <br />$1,248,000. This is because portions of the project are being completed by developers instead of <br />the City. The primary reason that the estimated ending fund balance decreases by $367,754 is that <br />the balance of the Measure B Trails revenue is being appropriated to the General Trail <br />Improvements project. <br /> <br />In the Streets CIP (Quarter 2 adjustments pages B l-B4), interest income estimates did not change. <br />The estimates for traffic related developer fees have been decreased by $1,797,642 due to the new <br />methodology explained above. The estimates for Gas Tax revenue have been reduced by <br />$100,000. Some transfers were made between funding sources within individual projects to use <br />Measure B and Gas Tax moneys instead of General Fund moneys. The 1-580 Corridor project has <br />been completed and presented to Council. The final accounting for this project decreased the <br />estimate of State grant reimbursements by $400,759 and increased the City's share of costs by <br />$490,634. The estimate of developer contributions revenue is increasing by $1,533,508. This is <br />primarily the Vineyard Avenue Specific Plan Fees that Council recently appropriated for the <br />Vineyard Corridor Infrastructure Improvements project. The $500,000 Sunol Boulevard Widening <br />project has been removed. There is a net $649,786 decrease in the estimated ending fund balance. <br /> <br />In the Miscellaneous CIP (Quarter 2 adjustments pages B17-B19), interest income estimates <br />increased by $41,301 in the Golf CIP Fund. The estimate for Public Facilities developer fees has <br />been decreased by $1,202,812 due to the new methodology explained above. The $1,830,333 <br />transfer from the Parks CIP referred to above was partially used to transfer $1,218,698 to the Golf <br />project and $217,943 to the Park CIP for the Val Vista Park project. Those transfers have already <br />been approved by Council. The estimated ending fund balance has been increased by $829,747, <br /> <br />SR 05:166 Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />