My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-91-105
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC-91-105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:34:04 AM
Creation date
6/15/2005 3:16:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/1991
DOCUMENT NO
PC-91-105
DOCUMENT NAME
TRACT 6442
NOTES
SIGNATURE PROPERTIES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-91-10S <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6....2, THE APPLICATION <br />OF SIGNATURE PROPERTIES <br /> <br />WHEREAS, signature Properties has applied for a vesting tentative <br />map to allow the subdivision of an approximately 12.46 <br />acre site into 151 townhouse-type lots and 3 common open- <br />space lots located on Lot 24 of the Hacienda Business <br />Park bounded by West Las positas Boulevard, stoneridge <br />Drive, the Arroyo Mocho Canal, and Tassajara Creek; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) <br />- High Density Residential District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of November 20, <br />1991, the Planning commission considered all public <br />testimony, relevant exhibits and recommendations of the <br />city staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the environmental issues related to this project were <br />addressed in a Negative Declaration which was adopted in <br />conjunction with approval of Case PUD-81-30-52D. The <br />proposed tentative map is consistent with the approved <br />PUD development plan, therefore, no additional <br />environmental document was prepared for this application; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed map is consistent with the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />At 12.12 dulac, the proposed project conforms to <br />the site's General Plan land Use Element <br />designation for High Density Residential (8+ du/ac) <br />land uses. The approved development plan is <br />covered by the previous summerhill Growth <br />Management Program allocation, meaning that the <br />project conforms to the city's General Plan growth <br />policies in regards to subdivision. <br /> <br />2. The site is physically suitable for this type of <br />development and density. <br /> <br />The site is a relatively flat with an existing <br />grade 2'-3' below street level. The subject <br />property is not located in the Alquist-Priolo study <br />Zone nor is it subject to the 100 year flood. <br />Grading will be limited to constructing building <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.