Laserfiche WebLink
<br />are calculated with a slightly lower average <br />of ~80 gallons per day. Because of the <br />relative small size of the existing residence <br />and the secondary unit, these estimates appear <br />to be quite generous. There should be little <br />impact on the existing sewer and utility <br />system from proposed secondary unit. However, <br />if the establishment of secondary units in <br />this area becomes a trend, more restrictive <br />limitations may have to be considered in the <br />future. <br /> <br />5) The Fire Department has traditionally required <br />that separate, consecutive numerical addresses <br />for both the primary and secondary dwelling <br />units should be displayed in such a manner to <br />be visible from the street as an indication <br />that two units exist on the parcel. <br /> <br />The proposed <br />detrimental to <br />welfare. <br /> <br />secondary unit will not be <br />the public health, safety, and <br /> <br />C. The proposed conditional use will comply with each <br />of the applicable provisions of this chapter. <br /> <br />The proposed addition of a secondary unit on the <br />property would be in compliance with all applicable <br />provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, minor alterations to land use limitations are <br />categorically exempt (Class 5) from the requirements of <br />the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). <br />Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this <br />report; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the proposed conditional use, as conditioned, is <br />appropriate for this site. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />section 1. Approves Case UP-91-54, the application of Jim and <br />Elaine Keysor for a conditional use permit to construct <br />a secondary unit attached to an existing single-family <br />residence located at 608 Romeo Court, subject to the <br />conditions shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made <br />part of this case by reference. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-71 <br />October 9, 1991 <br />