My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:173
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2005 1:52:41 PM
Creation date
6/15/2005 1:46:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/21/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:173
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The easement sets forth what uses are permitted and what uses are prohibited on the site. Most <br />of the permitted uses relate to the use of the property for habitat and related purposes, such as <br />building a water tank. Prohibited uses include any further subdivision of the property, <br />construction of most structures, and activities that would pollute or degrade the surface or <br />subsurface waters on the site. The easement also spells out that the City, as holder of the <br />easement, is to conduct inspections and other reasonable activities to monitor the owner's <br />compliance with the terms of the easement and, if necessary, to enforce the terms of the <br />easement. <br /> <br />The City, itself, however, has not conducted the inspections. Rather, the inspections have been <br />conducted by representatives of the Tri-Valley Conservancy (formerly known as the South <br />Livermore Valley Land Trust), a not for profit organization located in Livermore, which holds a <br />number of other conservation easements in the South Livermore area and has the knowledge and <br />expertise to perform these services. To date, the Tri-Valley Conservancy has not been paid by <br />the City for providing these services. Earlier this year, representatives from the Conservancy <br />discussed with staff a formal arrangement between the City and the Conservancy for these <br />services. The attached Agreement is the product of those discussions. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Conservancy representatives would coordinate with affected stakeholders--the Homeowners <br />Association, the State Department ofFish and Game, the site biologist (LSA)--and then make an <br />annual site visit to determine compliance with the terms of the easement. The Conservancy <br />would make a report to the City of its findings, including the status of the property owner's <br />compliance with the terms of the easement. (To the extent there is not compliance, it would be <br />incumbent for the City to follow up on these matters.) The Conservancy would also review the <br />annual report prepared by the site biologist and make recommendations to the City accordingly. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br /> <br />The Conservancy has offered to provide these services for $1525 the first year, with an increase <br />of $100 in each of the next two years (the Agreement is proposed to be three years in length). <br />This cost is similar to what the City is paying the California Rangelands Trust to monitor the <br />conservation easement on the Koopmann property adjacent to the golf course. Funds are <br />available for this purpose. <br /> <br />SR:05:173 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.