Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALJ:FORNJ:A <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-91-62 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CASE PUD-91-8, THE <br />APPLICATION OF RUSSELL SCHAEFFER <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Russell Schaeffer has applied for planned unit <br />development (PUD) rezoning and development plan approval <br />for a five-unit single-family residential development on <br />an approximately 1. 401 acre parcel located at 5059 <br />Foothill Road; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is Agricultural (A) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed hearing of September 11, 1991, the <br />Planning Commission, after considering all public <br />testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />city staff concerning this proposal, recommended approval <br />of the proposed negative declaration for Case PUD-91-8; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission makes the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare: <br /> <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all <br />applicable city standards concerning public health, <br />safety, and welfare, e.g. vehicle access, geologic <br />hazards (not within a special studies zone), and <br />flood hazards (not within a flood zone). The <br />proposed development is compatible with the <br />adjacent land uses, as well as the General Plan MDR <br />(Medium Density Residential) designation for this <br />site and all other relevant policies and programs. <br /> <br />2. The plan is consistent with the City's General <br />Plan: <br /> <br />At 3.6 units per acre, the project is within the <br />acceptable range for PUD-MDR (Medium Density <br />Residential) projects of 2-8 units/acre. Other <br />General Plan policies have been met: development <br />outside 100-year flood zone areas, development on <br />stable soils, construction (future) of semi-custom <br />housing stock, and densities consistent with <br />surrounding properties. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The plan is compatible with previously <br />properties in the vicinity and the <br />topographic features of the site: <br /> <br />developed <br />natural, <br />