Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OP PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-91-33 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CASE PUD-90-21, THE <br />APPLICATION OF ROY THOMPSON <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Roy Thompson has applied for PUD rezoning and development <br />plan approval for a three lot single-family custom home <br />development on a 0.98 acre site located at 6240 Sunol <br />Boulevard; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is "A" (Agricultural) District; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of May 8, 1991, the <br />Planning Commission, after considering all public <br />testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />ci ty staff concerning this proposal, recommended approval <br />of the proposed negative declaration for Case PUD-90-21; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare: <br /> <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all <br />applicable city standards concerning public health, <br />safety, and welfare, e.g. emergency vehicle access, <br />geologic hazards (compacted, graded pads), and flood <br />hazards (not within a flood zone). The proposed <br />development is consistent with the adjacent land uses, as <br />well as the General Plan MDR (Medium Density Residential) <br />designation for this site and all other relevant policies <br />and programs. <br /> <br />2. The plan is consistent with the city's General Plan: <br /> <br />At 3.0 units per acre, the project is within the <br />acceptable range for PUD-MDR (Medium Density Residential) <br />projects of 2-8 units/acre. other General Plan policies <br />have been met: development outside 100-year flood zone <br />areas, development on stable soils, construction (future) <br />of semi-custom housing stock, and densities consistent <br />with surrounding properties. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The plan is compatible <br />properties in the vicinity <br />features of the site: <br /> <br />with previously developed <br />and the natural, topographic <br />