My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-91-016
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC-91-016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2013 1:37:45 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 2:04:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/1991
DOCUMENT NO
PC-91-16
NOTES
BONDE RANCH
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />subdivision densities, as reflected by the density <br />designations on the general plan. <br /> <br />There are other potentiallY developable parcels <br />which could be reviewed. In the Happy Valley area, <br />the Harris property, the Kass property, the Amador <br />School District property and other properties in <br />that general vicinity constitute a cluster large <br />enough to consider for development as low density <br />residential lots. However, the city has considered <br />proposals by property owners in that area for <br />annexation and development. The residents of the <br />Happy Valley area have overwhelmingly demanded to <br />stay unincorporated, so Happy Valley could maintain <br />its rural character. As a result, the city council <br />agreed that Happy Valley is not suitable for <br />annexation and development at this time. Non- <br />contracted lands such as Happy Valley which council <br />has determined to be not suitable for annexation <br />and development are not available and not suitable <br />for low density housing development in preference <br />to the Garms parcel. <br /> <br />cancellation of the williamson Act for the Bonde property <br />is in the public interest. <br /> <br />A. other public concerns substantially outweigh the <br />objectives of the Williamson Act. <br />The relevant objectives of the williamson Act are, <br />in summary, as follows: (ll preservation of <br />limited agricultural land to maintain the <br />agricultural economy of the state and adequate food <br />for the future; (2l discouragement of premature and <br />unnecessary conversion of agricultural land to <br />urban uses benefits urban dwellers as it <br />discourages discontiguous patterns of development <br />which increase costs of community services; and (3) <br />agricultural lands have value as open space <br />constituting an important physical, social, <br />. esthetics, and economic asset to existing and <br />pending urban developments. <br /> <br />since the city acquired the right-of-way for Bernal <br />Avenue, the prior use of the site for boarding <br />horses has been discontinued and no grazing use has <br />been made of that portion of the site northerly of <br />Bernal Avenue. The portion of the site southerly <br />of Bernal Avenue, as indicated by Mrs. Bonde's <br />representative, is no longer economically viable as <br />grazing land for horses. The site is not prime <br />agricultural land (see EIRl, and evidence in the <br />record indicates it cannot support agricultural <br />use. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.