Laserfiche WebLink
<br />subdivision; and to the north is the older <br />Pleasanton Heights neighborhood. The vacant Lund <br />Ranch property is located on undeveloped fourth <br />side of the Bonde property. Uses on Lund Ranch are <br />limited to grazing and open space uses. <br /> <br />Development on the Bonde property is designed to be <br />compatible with these agricultural uses by locating <br />only seven units along Lund Ranch. Indeed, the <br />existing grazing uses of the Bonde property itself <br />have coexisted with residential uses similar to <br />those proposed on the Bonde property. Grazing <br />activities on the Lund Ranch property may continue <br />with negligible impact after implementation of the <br />proposed residential use. <br /> <br />C. The cancellation is for an alternative use which is <br />consistent with the applicable provisions of the <br />City's General Plan. <br /> <br />The General Plan Land Use Element designation for <br />the Bonde property is medium density residential <br />(2-8 dulacl, low density residential (<2 dulacl, <br />and rural density residential (1 du/5 acl land <br />uses, totaling 193 dwelling units with a maximum <br />density of 1.85 du/ac. The General Plan holding <br />capacity for the Bonde property is 118 dwelling <br />units. The project developer proposes 115 dwelling <br />units with a density of 1.12 du/ac. <br /> <br />D. The cancellation will not result in discontiguous <br />patterns of urban development. <br /> <br />The Bonde property is an infill site surrounded on <br />three sides by existing single-family residential <br />neighborhoods. The vacant Lund Ranch site is <br />located on the undeveloped fourth side of the Bonde <br />site. Bernal Avenue, Mirador Drive, Independence <br />Drive, East Angela street, and Hopkins Way are <br />adjacent streets which provide existing street <br />access and utilities to the Bonde parcel. <br />Development of the Bonde parcel constitutes an <br />orderly and efficient expansion of the city of <br />Pleasanton. <br /> <br />E. There is no proximate non-contracted land which is <br />both available and suitable for the use proposed on <br />the subject contracted land, or, that development <br />of the contracted land would provide more <br />contiguous patterns of urban development than <br />development of proximate non-contracted land. <br /> <br />There is no non-contracted infill land that can <br />serve as a practical alternative for the <br />