PC 10/23/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Horan asked if the dish was installed before the Design Review Board reviewed the application. Mr. Toomey affirmed that it was. Commissioner McGuirk stated that he was on the DRB when the application was reviewed. The Board's concern was that this application could start a precedent for future businesses who may wish to do the same thing. He commented that the restaurant dish could not be compared in importance with the police, fire and school satellite dishes. He concluded that he could live with the reduction in height, but pointed out that he would not wish to send a message to other businesses that this type of situation is acceptable. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Michelotti commented that she could not see the dish from Main Street, but that it was visible from Abbie Street. As a whole, she wished that other dishes were as unobtrusive. However, she also did not want to convey the impression that this was something that was very acceptable in the downtown area. A motion was made by Commissioner McGuirk, seconded by Commissioner Hovingh approving Case Z-91-93 subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Horan, Hovingh, McGuirk, Michelotti, and Chairman Mahern None None None Resolution No. PC-91-75 was entered and adopted approving Case Z-91-93 as motioned. PUD-91-2. Kav Ku Application for a Planned Unit Development rezoning and development plan approval for a revised 3 lot, custom home subdivision on the west side of Foothill Road located at 5130 Foothill Road. The subject property is located within the West Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District. Zoning for the property is "A" (Agricultural) District. Mr. Iserson presented the staff report recommending approval of Case PUD-91-2 subject to the conditions of the staff report. In response to Commissioner McGuirk's question, Mr. Iserson clarified that the 150 ft. setback from Foothill Road was measured to the house. In response to Chairman Mahern's question, Mr. Iserson noted that the proposed 120 ft. setback is to the building envelope. The front part of the hous.e could go to the edge of the building envelope. Minutes Planning Commission Meeting October 23, 1991 Page 8 - .