PC 08/28/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-91-2. Kav Ku Application for design review approval for a 3 lot, custom home planned unit development located on the west side of Foothill Road at 5130 Foothill Road. The subject property is located within the west Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District. Zoning for the property is II A" (Agricultural) District. Application continued to September 11, 1991. OLD BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARINGS PUD-91-4. DunkIevlMixlHansen Application for rezoning to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) - CS/O (Service Commercial and Office) District and development plan approval to allow commercial and office uses, construction and related trade uses, plant nurseries and storage uses, and contractors' equipment storage areas on a developed and vacant site totaling approximately 2.22 acres located at 63 and 73 Ray Street. Zoning for the property is C- S (Commercial-Service) District. Mr. Iserson presented the staff report recommending approval of Case PUD-91-4 subject to the conditions of the staff report. He wished to clarify that Dunkley and Mix own the rear lot, whereas Hansen manages the front lot. He also wished to clarify that the allowed contractors would have to store items only within the enclosed building. Commissioner Hovingh asked for clarification regarding Condition I.d. responded that this comes out of the regulations for storage of hazardous fuels. issue is to protect the surrounding homes from any possible danger. Mr. Iserson The main Mr. Iserson further clarified Conditions 7, 8, and 10. In regard to those conditions, staff favors removal of the words: "and/or prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for any of the office uses that would be allowed on the site by this rewning". THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Art Dunkley, 239 Main Street, Pleasanton, represented the application. He thanked staff and the neighbors for time spent with them. He felt there was much confusion going on about the project and wished to clarify they have no plans to develop anything on the vacant lot adjacent to them. He noted for those concerned that if plans should arise at some future time, it would have to come before the Planning Commission for approval. He said there are no intentions to change any approved uses at this time. He felt there was some concern from the neighbors because of misunderstandings regarding the units. One question that had been raised had to do with heavy equipment. Mr. Dunkley advised they have no intention of having heavy equipment stored on the site and is not opposed to having a condition reflecting that matter. -- MiDU~.. Planning commi..ion August 28, 1991 Page 7 ,. .